Magazine article National Defense

What Happens When the Feds Decide an Invention Is 'Secret?

Magazine article National Defense

What Happens When the Feds Decide an Invention Is 'Secret?

Article excerpt

It is widely understood that the U.S. government has an interest in maintaining the secrecy of sensitive information, including capabilities and activities of the intelligence agencies and military departments.

But it may be surprising to learn that the government also has the authority to tell individuals that their own knowledge --even commercially valuable knowledge--must be kept secret.

The Invention Secrecy Act provides authority for keeping inventions secret if the publication or disclosure of the invention would be detrimental to national security. Unauthorized publication, disclosure or foreign filing of the subject matter of designated patent application can result in abandonment of the application and additionally subject the person publishing or disclosing the subject matter to penalties, which can include a fine of up to $10,000 or imprisonment for up to two years, or both.

These protections are implemented via "secrecy orders," issued by the commissioner of patents upon review of the patent application by the United States Patent and Trademark Office and other designated agencies. The secrecy orders must typically be renewed each year, except during wartime or designated national emergency, and broadly apply to the subject matter of the invention, not just to the patent application itself. The orders restrict disclosure or publication of the invention in any form.

[ILLUSTRATION OMITTED]

The secrecy order process typically follows one of two paths. The first path includes inventions known to be classified. The applicant is typically aware, prior to filing, that the application will be subjected to a secrecy order and is well versed in the proper procedures and expected outcomes.

The second, more surprising, path involves the government making an independent decision that the subject matter of an application should be subjected to secrecy order--even if it has no relation to the government or government funding. This involves an initial review by the office and a subsequent review by a designated agency. Data released by the USPTO suggests that between 2010-2014 about 80 applications from private applicants, with no government funding or affiliation, were subjected to secrecy orders. This is out of a total of over 560 new secrecy orders during that time.

An applicant can seek compensation from the department that caused the order to be issued. After a secrecy order is lifted, a patent can issue on the application--assuming other statutory criteria are satisfied--and the patentee can proceed with commercializing the invention.

This system is less than optimal in many situations. If an examiner maintains rejections of a particular application, prosecution fees will continue to accumulate, with no possibility of compensation and/or prospect of subsequent patent issuance. Further, continuing advances in technology may render an application eventually allowed to issue as a patent as being far less valuable than it would have been if a timely issuance would have occurred. The nondisclosure requirements can also hamstring necessary development, testing and financing for companies' inventions while such orders are in effect.

The owner of an application that has been placed under a secrecy order can pursue administrative appeals of the designation via petition through the USPTO or to the secretary of commerce if the petition is denied.

Secrecy order petitioning processes are not well known to the average patent practitioner. An applicant may find it particularly challenging to find a qualified practitioner prepared to take on such administrative appeals. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.