Magazine article Clinical Psychiatry News

Five Ways New HHS Chief Could Change Health Care Policy

Magazine article Clinical Psychiatry News

Five Ways New HHS Chief Could Change Health Care Policy

Article excerpt

After a bruising confirmation process, the Senate confirmed Rep. Tom Price, MD, R-Ga., to head up the Department of Health & Human Services, by a 52-47 vote.

As secretary, Dr. Price will have significant authority to rewrite the rules for the Affordable Care Act, some of which are reportedly nearly ready to be issued.

But there is much more now within Dr. Price's purview, as head of an agency with a budget of more than $ 1 trillion for the current fiscal year. He can interpret laws in different ways than his predecessors and rewrite regulations and guidance, which is how many important policies are actually carried out.

"Virtually everything people do every day is impacted by the way the Department of Health & Human Services is run," said Matt Myers, president of the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. HHS responsibilities include food and drug safety, biomedical research, and disease prevention and control, as well as oversight over everything from medical laboratories to nursing homes.

Dr. Price, a Georgia physician who opposes the Affordable Care Act, abortion, and funding for Planned Parenthood, among other things, could have a rapid impact without even a presidential order or an act of Congress.

Some advocates are excited by that possibility. "With Dr. Price taking the helm of American health policy, doctors and patients alike have sound reasons to hope for a welcome and long-overdue change," Robert Moffit, a senior fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, said in a statement when Dr. Price's nomination was announced.

Others are less enthusiastic. Asked about what policies Dr. Price might enact, Topher Spiro of the liberal Center for American Progress said, "I don't know if I want to brainstorm bad ideas for him to do."

Here are five actions the new HHS secretary might take, according to advocates on both sides, that would disrupt health policies currently in force:

Birth control coverage: Under the ACA, most insurance plans must provide women with any form of contraception approved by the Food and Drug Administration at no additional cost. This has been particularly controversial in regard to religious employers who object to artificial contraception, leading to alterations in the rules, and resulting in two separate Supreme Court rulings, one about private firms' rights to make religious objections, and one about nonprofit religious hospitals and schools.

As secretary, Dr. Price would have two main options. He could expand the "accommodation" that already exempts some houses of worship from the requirement to any employer with a religious objection. Or, because the specific inclusion of birth control came via a regulation rather than the law itself, he could simply eliminate no-copay birth control coverage from the benefits insurance plans must offer. (This assumes continuing existence of the health law, at least for the short term.)

Medicare payment changes: The health law created an agency within Medicare, called the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, that was tasked with exploring new ways to pay doctors and hospitals that would reduce costs while maintaining quality. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.