Magazine article American Banker

Legislative Update

Magazine article American Banker

Legislative Update

Article excerpt

Action on Legislation Financial Modernization The House Commerce finance subcommittee is expected to vote soon on financial reform so the full committee can approve the legislation by the end of the month. House Republican leaders had given the committee a May 14 deadline, but Committee Chairman Thomas J. Bliley Jr. has asked for an extension.

The Senate adopted reform legislation May 6 on a 54-to-44 vote that was mostly along party lines. President Clinton has threatened to veto it unless rollbacks of the Community Reinvestment Act are reversed, more reinvestment requirements are added, and direct bank subsidiaries are granted more powers.

The bill would let banks, insurance companies, and securities firms own each other without restrictions. It would also prevent banks from entering commercial businesses and bar nonfinancial companies from chartering or purchasing unitary thrifts.

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Phil Gramm triumphed on votes involving CRA-related provisions and powers for bank subsidiaries.

The bill exempts from CRA rural banks with less than $100 million of assets. Banks with "satisfactory" or better CRA ratings for three consecutive years would be shielded from community group protests of mergers on CRA grounds-unless there is substantial new evidence that the rating is invalid.

The bill would let banks with under $1 billion of assets underwrite securities and insurance as well as conduct merchant banking in direct subsidiaries. Banks above that size could conduct sales and other low-risk activities in direct subsidiaries but would have to use holding company units for everything else.

House Banking passed its reform bill by a 51-to-8 vote on March 11. It has tougher CRA requirements and grants broader powers to bank subsidiaries. House Commerce is expected to make extensive changes. Bankruptcy

The fight for bankruptcy reform shifts to the Senate after the House on May 6 overwhelmingly approved a bill 313 to 108.

The House bill, sponsored by Rep. George W. Gekas, R-Pa., would require those with high disposable incomes to repay some unsecured debt in Chapter 13, rather than eliminating it all in Chapter 7. The bill relies on Internal Revenue Service estimates of living expenses - bolstered with more funds for food, clothing, and education - to determine disposable income. Social Security income would not count toward this test. The White House has threatened a veto.

The Senate version, which should come to the floor early next month and is sponsored by Sen. Charles E. Grassley, R-Iowa, is expected to include many consumer protections favored by the White House and opposed by lenders. Year-2000 Problem

The House Judiciary Committee on May 4 approved legislation to curb frivolous year-2000 lawsuits. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.