Magazine article American Banker

Research Scan: CEOs Paid with Stock Seen Slower to Merge

Magazine article American Banker

Research Scan: CEOs Paid with Stock Seen Slower to Merge

Article excerpt

Dozens of studies were presented or at least distributed at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's annual Bank Structure and Competition conference last week. A few are highlighted below, and all are available through the Chicago Fed's Web site, www.frbchi.org.

Banks are less likely to merge if their chief executive officers are paid in stock, write Richard T. Bliss of Babson College and Richard J. Rosen of Indiana University.

The researchers find that mergers typically result in higher pay for chief executives but lower stock prices. This means chief executives have an incentive to undertake mergers that are not in the best interest of shareholders. "The CEO wins, even when the stock market bids the price down," Mr. Rosen explains.

To eliminate this incentive, the researchers say, companies should pay their executives in stock. This would make top managers less likely to undertake mergers and other projects detrimental to investors. "You'll pay them less and there will be fewer mergers," he says.

The study, "CEO Compensation and Bank Mergers," covers 60 major deals from 1986 to 1995 that were collectively worth $729 billion. The average bank asset size was $63 billion, though the researchers say their findings hold true for smaller banks.

Overages in Mortgage Pricing" dissects who pays more for home loans and why. Harold A. Black, Thomas P. Boehm, and Ramon P. DeGennaro, all professors at the University of Tennessee, find that competition plays a large role in determining how much a borrower pays. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.