Magazine article Editor & Publisher

Court Decision for Free-Lancers Could Leave Gaps in Archives Resale Consent Necessary

Magazine article Editor & Publisher

Court Decision for Free-Lancers Could Leave Gaps in Archives Resale Consent Necessary

Article excerpt

If publishers didn't feel the initial tremors of the landmark decision concerning free-lance writers Sept. 24, they will most definitely feel the aftershocks rippling through their Web sites, archives, and databases in the coming months.

A federal appeals court ruled that the New York Times Co. and other publishers cannot re-sell free-lance newspaper and magazine articles through electronic databases without the authors' permission.

"This ruling is a major victory for the 5,400 free-lance writers who are members of [the National Writers Union]," said Jonathan Tasini, lead plaintiff in the case and president of the nwu, Local 1981 of the United Auto Workers, afl-cio.

Last week's ruling overturns a previous decision by U.S. District Court Judge Sonia Sotomayor, who found that publishers were protected from copyright infringement under an exception to the Copyright Act of 1976. According to Sotomayor, the reformatting and transfer of free-lance articles into databases such as Nexis (now Lexis-Nexis) constituted a "revision."

"Reading 'revision of that collective work' as broadly as appellees suggest would cause the exception to swallow the rule," reads the reversal, handed down by a three-judge panel of the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and written by Chief Judge Ralph K. Winter.

"What the court opinion is saying is a negative for the Times, for the free-lancers, and for society," said George Freeman, assistant general counsel for the New York Times Co., which is considering an appeal.

Although the Times and many other publishers have, for some time, been securing "all-rights" contracts with free-lancers that include electronic publishing rights, the real danger for publishers lies largely in retroactive claims of infringement on articles posted in electronic archives.

This decision could force the large-scale removal of free-lance pieces dating back to 1996, creating significant gaps in the newspaper's archives. (The statute of limitations for copyright-infringement lawsuits is three years, according to media law experts.)

"A good many publishers have a terrific job ahead of them, sorting out the enormous amount of stories in databases around the world," said Bill Burger, vice president of content at Infonautics, a leading Internet information archiving company, adding that they will comply with any decision reached between the publishers and writers. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.