Magazine article New Criterion

Notes & Comments: November 1999

Magazine article New Criterion

Notes & Comments: November 1999

Article excerpt

Better late ...

NEWS FLASH! In the last days of the last year of the twentieth century, The New York Review of Books has made an amazing and horrifying discovery: that the teaching of literature in our university English departments is in deep--well, let us say trouble. Just imagine! So grave has the situation now suddenly been discovered to be by the New York Review's editors that they have thrown all caution to the winds and actually published an article in their issue of November 4 that poses the question: "What does it all mean? Should the teaching of English be given a decent burial, or is there life in it yet?" While the answer to this question remains moot, both in the article and in the academy itself, its author--Andrew Delbanco, the Julian Clarence Levi Professor of the Humanities at Columbia University--doesn't hesitate, except in one important regard, to describe the wounds that have been inflicted on the patient he has been called upon to attend under emergency conditions.

What now passes for the teaching of literature in our university English departments, writes Professor Delbanco, "has come to reflect some of the worst aspects of our culture: obsessing about sex, posturing about real social inequities while leaving them unaddressed, and participating with gusto in the love/hate cult of celebrities." And further: "In what is perhaps the largest irony of all, the teaching of English has been penetrated, even saturated, by the market mentality it decries. The theory factory (yesterday's theory is deficient, today's is new and improved) has become expert in planned obsolescence." There is even a good word for Lionel Trilling in this article, and a hint, quickly balanced by equivocation, that some of the new fields of study in the English departments--"feminist, gay and lesbian, and postcolonial studies, the New Historicism ... and, most recently, 'eco-criticism'"--might just not be as wonderful as they have been claimed to be.

Let us acknowledge, then, that there is much that is excellent in Professor Delbanco's article, which is called "The Decline and Fall of Literature" and reviews a slew of recent publications on the subject. Yet it must also be said that there is not much in the article that will be new to readers of The New Criterion. It was in our issue of December 1983, after all, that we published Rene Wellek's essay "Destroying Literary Studies," which sounded the alarm about the very developments that have now brought the study of literature in our universities to the brink of extinction. From his position as a scholar in comparative literature at Yale University, Professor Wellek understood exactly what was at stake:

   Today [the] whole edifice of literary study has come under an attack that
   is not merely the normal criticism of certain aspects of a changing
   discipline but an attempt to destroy literary studies from the inside. The
   attempt seems to have succeeded in certain academic circles; it has
   enlisted the support of a number of journals and has affected many
   students, apparently all over the country. It has hardly dislodged or even
   modified up till now the practice of the vast majority of teachers and
   students of literature. But it has had considerable publicity and, if it
   should be generally effective and find many adherents among the younger
   generation, may spell the breakdown or even the abolition of all
   traditional literary scholarship and teaching.

For issuing this warning, Rene Wellek was denounced by the then president of the Modern Language Association, Professor Helen Vendler, as an "old-fogey"--so was another eminent literary scholar, W. Jackson Bate--as the rush to complete "the breakdown or even the abolition of all traditional literary scholarship and teaching" proceeded on its merry, nihilistic course.

Why was it left to a few conservative writers--our own Roger Kimball, author of Tenured Radicals, prominently among them --to resist this destructive course, which began in the literature departments of the universities and soon spread to virtually every branch of the humanities and even into the law schools? …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.