Magazine article American Banker

Banks' 'Goodwill' Idea Leaves FASB Cold

Magazine article American Banker

Banks' 'Goodwill' Idea Leaves FASB Cold

Article excerpt

The Financial Accounting Standards Board expressed doubt Wednesday about an industry alternative to its proposal that would eliminate pooling-of-interests accounting for mergers. Representatives of Morgan Stanley Dean Witter & Co., Goldman Sachs & Co., Deloitte & Touche, PricewaterhouseCoopers, and Arthur Andersen recommended that goodwill be recorded on the books as an asset and tested for reductions in value. The presentation contrasts the FASB's original proposal, under which goodwill -- the difference between a company's acquisition price and its underlying assets -- would be written off over a 40-year period under the purchase method of accounting. Elimination of pooling has been controversial because many companies argue that amortizing goodwill under the FASB's proposal automatically assumes it to be a diminishing asset. The presenters recommended a model "impairment" test Wednesday that would let companies evaluate goodwill and then account for gains or losses in its value. Though FASB Chairman Edmund L. Jenkins said the presentation would be a part of future deliberations on the issue, he noted that similar proposals have produced negative feedback. "Most companies have told us they'd rather write (goodwill) off immediately than take an impairment charge at an uncertain later date," Mr. Jenkins said. Representatives from Morgan Stanley and Goldman Sachs argued that goodwill should not be amortized, because it introduces more error into analysts' attempts to predict earnings from financial statements and fails to accurately reflect economic reality. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.