Magazine article Black Issues in Higher Education

The Gore/bush Records on Higher Education

Magazine article Black Issues in Higher Education

The Gore/bush Records on Higher Education

Article excerpt

COMMENTARY COMMENTARY COMMENTARY COMMENTARY COMMENTARY COMMENTARY

When Texas Gov. George W. Bush made a campaign stop at Bob Jones University in Greenville, S.C., in early February, the Republican provoked one of the first crises of the campaign season. The content of this crisis was not higher education policy, but the role of Christian conservative voters in the South. Yet, polling data indicates that voters of all stripes consider education to be the primary issue of the 2000 campaign because of its link to a high-tech, upwardly mobile future for parents and their children. So, the position of the two major presidential candidates on this issue is crucial to assess as it applies to the Black community.

GEORGE W. BUSH

The impression that Bush made during most of the primary season was that he was not prepared to make higher education much of a priority in his campaign. Indeed, his issue agenda rarely went beyond proposing a change in the tax-free status of education saving accounts to include both public and private institutions. Otherwise he has had a decidedly mixed record -- even in his own state of Texas, where he most often followed the initiatives of his Democratic-controlled legislature.

In Texas, the highest profile issue during his tenure has been the Hopwood decision, in which a Federal district court invalidated affirmative action in university admissions. This was followed by the state attorney general's decision to void racially oriented college scholarship programs. Bush's reaction to these events was slow. To fill the gap in college access for students of color, he basically supported an initiative that developed legislation using a 10 Percent Plan. This plan provided automatic admission to all state public institutions of higher education for the top 10 percent of students in each high school. Because of Bush's failure to immediately pledge any new scholarship aid, Black State Sen. Rodney Ellis, D-Houston, proposed and won a $100 million appropriation for state scholarship grants for 20,000 students.

One of the thorniest issues for Bush was the challenge to eliminate the traditional system of racial segregation in higher education in Texas lodged by the federal authorities. Bush's response to this problem was slow as well, but he eventually signed an agreement in the spring of this election year to improve funding for the two historically Black universities -- Texas Southern and Prairie View A&M.

A corollary to this problem stemmed from two lawsuits by faculty at Texas Southern University alleging the state was perpetuating racial discrimination in higher education. The first suit charged that by competitive funding of White institutions in Houston, the state enabled White students to avoid attending Texas Southern University. The second suit held that the award of nearly $1 billion in tobacco funds solely to a White medical school violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. These cases have since been resolved.

Republicans sought to improve the party's image with Black voters when leaders such as Congressman J.C. Watts, R-Okla., held a well-publicized meeting with Black college presidents before the Republican National Convention. Afterward, Gov. Bush, speaking at Dillard University in New Orleans, proposed a 77 percent increase in federal aid to all 104 HBCUs from the current level of $180 million to $320 million over five years.

AL GORE

Early in the campaign, Vice President Al Gore pointed often to the Clinton/Gore administration s substantial increases in Pell Grants, forgiveness of HBCUs for accounting problems, strong support for affirmative action in higher education and other initiatives affecting Blacks. But the public wanted to know where Gore stood on education apart from his role in the Clinton administration's accomplishments. During the campaign he has initiated proposals to lift the financial burden for low- and middle-income families, thereby improving their ability to afford a college education for their children. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.