Magazine article American Banker

Campaign Finance Bill May Let Commercial Banks Stand Out

Magazine article American Banker

Campaign Finance Bill May Let Commercial Banks Stand Out

Article excerpt

The commercial bank lobby is expected to benefit if the drive to reform campaign finance laws succeeds.

That is because the McCain-Feingold legislation, slated for a vote in the Senate today, would ban soft money -- the unlimited amounts of cash that companies, unions, and individuals may donate to political parties.

And unlike its rivals in the securities and insurance sectors, the banking industry does not give much soft money.

"A soft-money ban would serve banks very well -- most don't use soft money," said Annie Hall, a former Bank One lobbyist who now runs Hard Money Inc., a consulting firm that helps corporations establish political action committees.

Campaign finance reform could make commercial banks -- big and small -- the dominant lobbying force within the financial services industry, she said.

Soft-money giving has exploded, with the Republican and Democratic parties pulling in $487.5 million in the 2000 elections, up from $86.1 million in 1992. Critics claim the large sums force politicians to rely too heavily on big-buck donations from special interests.

Kenneth A. Guenther, president and chief executive officer of the Independent Community Bankers of America, said the legislation would help his members. "The little guys can't play in the soft-money game," he said, adding that the current system stacks the deck in big banks' favor "to the detriment of small banks."

Mr. Guenther sees campaign finance reform as a way to even things out: "This is an urgent matter for community banks."

Bankers traditionally rely on hard money -- the strictly limited contributions individuals and political action committees make directly to candidates or political parties. "The financial services industry is not a major player in the soft-money field," said the American Bankers Association chief lobbyist, Edward L. Yingling.

In addition to banning soft money, the legislation would double the $1,000 cap on contributions that individuals may make in the primary and general elections. It would not change laws governing political action committees, which may collect up to $5,000 from individuals annually and may donate $5,000 to a candidate per election, $15,000 to a political party annually, and $5,000 a year to any other PAC.

It is not clear whether the House will pass the bill, but President Bush is expected to sign a campaign finance bill if one lands on his desk.

According to data compiled by the Center for Responsive Politics, commercial banks contributed $25 million to federal candidates during the 2000 election cycle, only 24% of it in the form of soft money. Securities firms gave nearly $89 million during the 2000 elections. Of that, almost 44% was in the form of soft-money donations. The insurance industry, led by Blue Cross/Blue Shield, gave roughly $40.5 million, of which 39. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.