Magazine article American Journalism Review

Journalists Are Still Wary of Online News. (Too Sheptical)

Magazine article American Journalism Review

Journalists Are Still Wary of Online News. (Too Sheptical)

Article excerpt

Journalists are concerned about the credibility of digital news, hut the online public says it's a non-issue.

That's a key finding of a survey commissioned by the Online News Association to gauge perceptions of how well online sites are meeting basic journalistic standards.

"The public is more sure of us than our own colleagues," says Rich Jaroslovsky, president of the Online News Association and a senior editor at the Wall Street Journal.

"It's our peers who don't frankly understand what we do or know," adds Michael Silberman, an managing editor.

Online readers and journalists across all mediums were surveyed between January and September in a study funded by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Study highlights were presented this fall at a conference of Internet journalists in Berkeley, California.

The survey included 1,027 members of the U.S. online public and 1,397 journalists. A smaller group of journalists was interviewed face-to-face to flesh out thoughts and concerns.

The majority of the Internet news consumers were either neutral or positive on the credibility question: When asked if online news sites were their most trusted source for news, 13 percent agreed, 44 percent said they were neutral or had not yet formed an opinion, and 43 percent disagreed.

The journalists inaccurately assessed the mood of the public, erroneously predicting 79 percent of them would disagree with the most-trusted-source question.

Among other findings: Both the public and journalists viewed national news sources as more credible than local ones. When asked to rank 16 types of news outlets, 95 percent of journalists ranked national newspapers as their most credible sources for news. Of the public, 83 percent ranked cable TV news most credible.

Study codirectors Martha Stone and Howard I. Finberg wondered if the disparity between the public's and the journalists' perceptions was due to a difference in standards. "Are the media's standards for evaluating credibility higher than the public's?" their report asks. "Or is there something the media perceives or knows about the ethics and practices of online news that the public does not know? …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.