Magazine article The Christian Century

Innate Value

Magazine article The Christian Century

Innate Value

Article excerpt

I HAVE A DIM recollection of Jeremy Bentham's utilitarian philosophy from a course in college. Utilitarianism appealed to me at a time when I was more certain of myself intellectually and more academically confident that I have been since. It had something to do with being a sophomore, I believe. For utilitarians, moral behavior is that which increases happiness and reduces human suffering. Who can argue with that?

Peter Singer of Princeton University brings the common sense of utilitarianism to the ethical dilemmas of the 21st century with ruthless consistency. The worth of a single human life is not in the equation for utilitarians if that life gets in the way of increasing the well-being and happiness or reducing the suffering of the community. As Mark Oppenheimer notes, for Singer this means it can sometimes be "OK to kill babies" (see p. 24). I have a problem with that.

Clergy confront the ethical dilemmas raised by Singer and his disciples every time we visit elderly patients who are victims of advanced Alzheimer's disease and who are being sustained at great expense. Utilitarians suggest that money could be used to reduce suffering elsewhere. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.