Magazine article Editor & Publisher

Reporters at Al-Rashid to Remain Iraq Steady

Magazine article Editor & Publisher

Reporters at Al-Rashid to Remain Iraq Steady

Article excerpt

Facing a 'completely terrifying prospect' in Baghdad, they keep pens, and gas masks, at the ready

Although most of the Western journalists holed up this week inside the Al-Rashid Hotel in Baghdad awaiting a U.S. attack on Iraq weren't there when the Persian Gulf War started, they can feel its links to the past. Best known as the building where TV journalists telecast the first U.S. bombing strike 12 years ago, the hotel's violent legacy remains uppermost in the minds of reporters staying there now.

Hoping (perhaps against hope) that military training, both from private companies and the Pentagon, will be enough to protect them, even as they stock up on gas masks and protective clothing, many of the dozens of reporters and photojournalists stationed at the hotel told E&P that they're excited at the prospect of being in the enemy's capital when the action begins.

"It is a huge opportunity, but a completely terrifying prospect," said Ian Fisher, a correspondent for The New York Times who spoke from his fifth-floor room at the Al-Rashid. "A huge topic here is whether to be here or not when the fighting starts. I think most are ambitious and news-hungry for it." Rajiv Chandrasekaran of The Washington Post, who is on his fourth Baghdad tour since September, agreed: "It is of manifest importance to be here. Many people are intent on staying for the duration."

Most evenings find reporters gathered at Al-Rashid's Internet cafe, where they can file stories, check e-mail and the Web, and share tea and Turkish coffee. Although alcohol is permitted in Iraq, unlike neighboring Kuwait, it is not the drink of choice, according to reporters, who also make little use of the hotel's two pools. On every journalist's mind, of course, is the pending U.S. attack. "Anybody who says they are not afraid is foolish," said Bill Glauber of the Chicago Tribune, whose room is down the hall from where three CNN correspondents made history with play-by-play accounts of the 1991 attack. "It is important to be here because you have to witness as best you can."

Roger Cohen, foreign editor of The New York Times, raised a hidden danger, pointing out that the Iraqi people may be more hostile to the press than they were in 1991 because the U.S. is seeking not merely a rollback from Kuwait but a regime change. "This is a very different kind of war," he said.

Being able to maintain a news presence in the Iraqi capital city may be tougher than reporters think. Safety concerns, the never-ending tug-of- war for visas, and uncertainty about when an attack will occur have put many plans on a roulette wheel of uncertainty. "It is very fluid," said Susan Stevenson, deputy managing editor for The Atlanta Journal- Constitution, which expects to have at least one reporter in Baghdad by this week. "The visa situation makes it very difficult to plan." Iraq has given few newspapers more than one visa at a time, with a 10-day limit for each. After a visa expires, a renewal must be requested -- and can take weeks to approve. Although most of the journalists expect an attack to occur within a month or so, the 10-day limit means they can't be sure if they'll be able to remain in the city long enough to cover an invasion. This means that the papers have "to make this up" as they go along, said Andrew Ross, executive foreign and national editor for the San Francisco Chronicle. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.