Magazine article The Spectator

A-Day for Dummies

Magazine article The Spectator

A-Day for Dummies

Article excerpt

Next Thursday is A-Day, the day on which, according to the Department for Work and Pensions, the 'new simplified rules on pensions come into effect, offering simpler and more flexible retirement arrangements'. If you haven't got the hang of them by now, Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (HMRC) has produced a set of notes running to, er, 164 pages.

To put it even more simply than the HMRC can manage in that document: the government wants to give us tax relief on pensions in order to encourage us to save for our retirement. But it is concerned that by taking advantage of the tax relief we might become too rich, so it has devised a bizarrely complex new scheme to tax our tax relief.

The rules on pension funds are -- presimplification -- relatively simple. The money you pay into your pension fund qualifies for income tax relief at 22 per cent or 40 per cent, depending on your earnings. If you are aged up to 35, you can put 17.5 per cent of your gross annual earnings into your pension plan; a percentage which rises as you approach retirement. Come A-Day and the tax relief is being made, at first glance, more generous. From now on you will be able to pay your entire salary into your pension fund, up to a maximum of £215,000 in any one year, and qualify for tax relief on every penny. Yet because nobody pays income tax on every penny they earn -- there being a personal allowance that is free from tax -- this will create a bizarre situation in which you could actually be making a profit from the taxman. However, you will have to be rather wary of taking up this unprecedented offer, because if your accumulated pension pot grows to a new 'lifetime annual limit' of £1,500,000, any excess will henceforth be taxed at a shocking 55 per cent.

This is the most punitive rate of personal taxation in Britain since the early 1980s, and it is not just the wealthy who will be affected.

The sum of £1.5 million does not go far these days when it comes to buying a decent pension. For a male aged 60, for example, it will buy an annuity of around £45,000 -- not much more than the £37,397 a year goldplated, index-linked pension which an MP qualifies for after 27 years' service. Needless to say, there will be no question of MPs paying the new tax: theirs is a final salary scheme, paid directly out of public funds, so there is no pot of money to be taxed.

Moreover, it will extremely difficult to try to plan to avoid the new 55 per cent tax.

How do you know, when investing £1,000 in some obscure Russian oil company, that its share price will not rocket, taking your pension fund above £1.5 million and liable to be taxed at 55 per cent? Neither can you reduce your liability to tax at 55 per cent by taking money out of your pension fund; once it is in, you cannot get at it until at least the age of 50, soon to be raised to 55.

If the Chancellor is so concerned about us making such profits tax-free, why give us such generous tax relief in the first place? Gordon Brown's approach to pensions right from the start has been that of a daft old aunt who keeps handing out gifts and then asking for them back. One of his election promises in 1997 was to introduce cut-price 'stakeholder' pensions to encourage more people to save for their retirement. Yet one of his first acts as Chancellor was to abolish dividend tax credits on pension funds, hugely suppressing the rate at which share investments within a pension fund can grow. Then, three years ago, he came up with a scheme so generous that the accountants could hardly believe it:

he told us that from A-Day we would be allowed to put wine, antiques and property into our pension funds. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.