Magazine article The Spectator

Watches? Not for Me

Magazine article The Spectator

Watches? Not for Me

Article excerpt

When I was seven my father gave me a duty-free Timex, my first watch. I loved it, wore for it years, and haven't had another one since it stopped ticking a decade ago.

Why? Because I don't need one. I have a mobile phone and a laptop and I'm always near someone with an iPod or a Blackberry. All these devices display the time -- which is why, if you look around, you'll see loads of empty wrists: sales of watches to young adults fell 10 per cent in 2005.

But while the sensible have realised that they don't need them, others -- apparently including distinguished Spectator contributors -- are spending absolute fortunes on them. The luxury watch sector is booming. Brands such as Patek Philippe, Jaeger-LeCoultre and Breitling command obscene prices, up to £250,000 for a bespoke piece.

This is absurd. Expensive cars go faster than cheap cars. Expensive clothes hang better than cheap clothes. But these days all watches tell the time as well as all other watches. Pricy watches come with extra functions -- but who needs them?

How often do you dive to 300 metres in a mini-submarine or need to find your bearings in the Antarctic? So why pay the equivalent of five years' school fees for watches that allow you to do these things? …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.