Magazine article Behavioral Healthcare Executive

Scraping for Evidence

Magazine article Behavioral Healthcare Executive

Scraping for Evidence

Article excerpt

Limited access to mental healthcare, often based on inadequate empirical evidence, leads to interior care for too many children and adolescents. This dilemma has reached a critical juncture, and the situation must improve or an entire generation of children is at risk of having unmet mental health needs, especially minority children and those from lower-income families (who often have more difficult access issues).

In its final report in August 2006, the American Psychological Association Working Group on Psychotropic Medications for Children and Adolescents (which I chaired) cited many reasons for the current crisis in children's mental healthcare.1 Among ihem were specific gaps in the evidence base for children's mental health treatments, cuts in Medicaid funding, poor reimbursement for mental health services, and the dearth of clinicians specifically trained to work with children. These limitations and deficiencies have led to the use of interventions (including medications) for which we have insufficient knowledge about efficacy and safety.

Too often writing a prescription has been the easiest or the only available treatment course for a child who presents with an emotional or menial health problem. But data on the safety and effectiveness of psychotropic medication use in children are lacking. For example, despite the paucity of efficacy and safety data on treating children with antipsychotic medications, there was a six-fold increase in the use of antipsychotics to treat children between 1993 and 2002.2 Therefore, questions about these drugs' long-term effects on developing brains have become even more critical.

The working group's report calls for increased use of treatments for children that are based on solid scientific evidence. It also emphasizes the need to balance a treatment's benefits with its potential risks. As many psychosocial treatments have been found to he effective and have better risk profiles than most medications, the working group called for an emphasis on these types of treatments.

Yet the working group found that existing evidence for most mental health treatments for children, both psychosocial and psychopharmacologic, is uneven across disorders, age groups, race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. It found that more needs to be known about the interplay of treatment with school and family dynamics, and the effect of treatments on the functional outcomes of academic achievement and peer relationships.

To provide children with more evidence-based care in the long run, the working group recommends:

* longitudinal studies of treatment efficacy and effectiveness for specific disorders (childhood depression, preschool and adolescent ADHD, adolescent autism, etc. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.