Magazine article The CPA Journal

A Change in Domicile from New York to Florida Can Help Minimize Taxes

Magazine article The CPA Journal

A Change in Domicile from New York to Florida Can Help Minimize Taxes

Article excerpt

Retirees who have homes in both New York and Florida may be able to reduce or eliminate New York income and estate taxes, and also reduce the real estate taxes on their Florida home by changing their domicile to Florida. The benefit of doing so has been enhanced by the elimination of the Florida estate tax and the repeal of the Florida intangible tax on stocks and bonds, which went into effect on January 1, 2007. It has been further enhanced by the Florida constitutional amendment that places a cap of 3% on any annual increase in assessments applicable to a Florida homestead, but not to a Florida home owned by a New Yorker.

Retirees who have a substantial securities portfolio have benefited from the 15% federal income tax on stock dividends and capital gains. In contrast, both the dividends and capital gains are subject to New York income taxes at a rate as high as 7%. Similarly, Congress has increased the federal estate tax unified credit to $2 million, while New York continues to impose its estate tax on estates greater than $1 million. The failure of New York to give comparable tax relief has motivated many New Yorkers with homes in both New York and Florida to consider a change of domicile to eliminate New York income and estate taxes in their entirety.

Checklist to Determine Eligibility

Not all retirees who own homes in New York and Florida are eligible to elect Florida as their domicile. Domicile is characterized in the New York tax regulations as the place that an individual intends to be his permanent home and the place to which he intends to return whenever he may be absent. The regulations provide that, once established, a domicile continues until the person moves to a new location with the bona fide intention of making his fixed and permanent home there. A person's declarations are given due weight, but they will not be conclusive if they are contradicted by conduct. For example, the regulations state that registering and voting in one place is important but not necessarily conclusive. Likewise, the length of time customarily spent at each location is important but not conclusive. A person can have only one domicile. If an individual has two or more homes, the domicile is the one regarded and used as the permanent home.

The leading case in New York was decided by the New York Court of Appeals in 1908 (Matter of Newcomb, 192 N.Y. 238). It remains "good law." Mrs. Newcomb, during a 30-year period, and until she was 80, was domiciled in New York City. She generally resided during the winter in her home in New Orleans and resided during the summer in her residence in New York City. She wanted to make substantial bequests to Tulane University and was concerned that the will might be contested by her relatives. She consulted with a Louisiana attorney, who advised her to change her domicile by making an express declaration in writing to that effect. She signed a declaration stating that New Orleans was her permanent home and her place of domicile. It was argued that Newcomb resided in New York City and merely visited New Orleans, and that her later visits to New Orleans differed in no material respect from those made earlier. It was also argued that she sought to become a nominal resident of Louisiana merely for the purpose of making a Louisiana will and not for making a permanent home. The court rejected that approach and established the following rules for determining domicile when the retiree maintains two residences:

* There must be a present, definite, and honest purpose to give up the old place and take up the new place as the domicile.

* Every retiree may select and make his or her own domicile, but the selection must be followed by proper action. Motives are immaterial except as they indicate intention.

* A change of domicile may be made through caprice, whim, or fancy; for business, health, or pleasure; to secure a change of climate or a change of laws; or for any reason whatsoever, provided that there is an absolute and fixed intention to abandon one and acquire another and that the acts of the persons confirm this intention. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.