Magazine article The Spectator

Why We Are in Afghanistan for the Long Haul

Magazine article The Spectator

Why We Are in Afghanistan for the Long Haul

Article excerpt

The phrase 'think global, act local' originated in the environmental movement. It can be a glib substitute for serious attention to large problems. But it can also be a telling rejoinder to the temptations of top-down, big-government solutions.

I believe it is relevant to our challenge in Afghanistan.

The potential problems emanating from that country are global in scope. Afghanistan is at the centre of international terrorism and the drugs trade. But the solutions need to be local -- in tune with the needs and circumstances of the people. This was brought home to me on a trip there in July.

I decided that my first visit as Foreign Secretary outside Europe should be to Afghanistan, followed by Pakistan. The reason is that what has happened in Afghanistan, and what will happen there, directly affects British interests and British people in profound and direct ways.

Everyone should know that al-Qa'eda prepared its assault on the West -- of which the horror of 9/11 was only the most atrocious example -- in the valleys and hills of eastern Afghanistan. Now we know too that most British terrorism investigations trace back to the training camps just across the border, in western Pakistan. A 1,500-mile border that the Taleban and their al-Qa'eda associates cross and recross, despite both governments' efforts to control that lethal traffic.

So our direct interests are at stake in tackling the terrorist threat. But so is our word.

At Bonn, in December 2001, and again in London, in January 2006, the world made a pledge to the long-suffering people of Afghanistan: after nearly 30 years of unparalleled suffering at the hands of the Soviet Union, the warlords, and then the Taleban, we would help them all -- women as well as men -- to set up a state of their own, free from oppression.

As I saw for myself in Kabul, Kandahar and Helmand, reaching that destination is not going to be quick or easy. Afghanistan is two places from the bottom of the UN Human Development Index, poorer than most countries in sub-Saharan Africa. A poverty compounded by war, exacerbated by the massive outward migration of human talent, and still darkened by the shadows of drought and famine.

Despite this you sense the quiet pride of the peoples of Afghanistan -- Pashtun, Tajik, Uzbek, Hazara and many others -- and their determination to rebuild their country. I saw this for myself at the funeral of Afghanistan's last king, Zahir Shah, who was deposed in 1973, but who returned in 2002 as 'Father of the Nation'. As we sat under the plane trees in the gardens of the Royal Palace, listening to the funeral prayers, I saw around me a gathering of Afghans of every race and background, in a display of the unity that is at once possible and essential.

To serve our interests and those of ordinary Afghans the social, economic and political changes require stability. We must help Afghans squeeze out of their country, both physically and morally, those elements whose malign purpose is to deny Afghanistan the future it deserves. The Taleban, above all, whose objective -- the imposition of a mediaeval emirate in the name of Islam across as much of Afghanistan as they could conquer -- would consign millions of Afghan men and especially women to miseries they remember only too well. Taleban success would produce an opposite reaction from the North, bringing back the dark days of civil war. If we allow Afghanistan to become a failed state, it will always be a target for terrorist activity. If we can support the Afghan government in establishing stability and the rule of law, it can become a target for development. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.