Magazine article Behavioral Healthcare Executive

Reviewing EAPs' Clinical Outcomes

Magazine article Behavioral Healthcare Executive

Reviewing EAPs' Clinical Outcomes

Article excerpt

Big Blue surprised me. Managers at IBM told my organization (Masi Research Consultants) that they were not as interested in cost-benefit studies of their employee assistance programs as they were in clinical reviews of them. They believed that if employees were receiving good counseling, their productivity would increase. This surprised me because on my first day working for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the assistant secretary said we needed to develop a cost-benefit methodology and study to show that its EAP was cost-effective. I thought it was ironic that HHS wanted cost-benefit reviews whereas IBM wanted clinical reviews.

Clinical reviews of EAPs are rare, as Thomas Amaral pointed out in his presentation at last year's Employee Assistance Society of North America annual conference. The Council on Accreditation (COA), however, performs reviews as part of its EAP accreditation process, and some consultants individually read records when evaluating a program.

IBM had another incentive for performing clinical reviews of EAP services. Its attorneys believed that clinical reviews by outstanding clinicians protected the company in any litigation around an EAP case. By hiring a bona fide evaluation team, IBM was ensuring that its employees received quality care. The reviews also ensured that all appropriate documentation, such as statements of understanding and release of information forms, were signed and that counselors were following applicable laws.

As we worked with IBM, we developed a protocol for clinical reviews of EAPs. If you are an EAP provider or customer considering a clinical review, look for the following elements in a review team.

The clinical review should be based on the fact that clinical work can be quantified. In our work with IBM, this meant that a rigorous instrument had to be devised, whereby reviewers numerically scored all aspects of clinical work. Through the years, this instrument was refined and registered with the U.S. Copyright Office. It uses 18 documentation questions and 34 clinical questions. Some of our clients use the resulting scores in their performance guarantees in their contracts with EAP providers.

A significant sample of records should be reviewed. The team should aim for reviewing 10% of the records. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.