Magazine article Public Finance

Home Is Where Your Wealth Is

Magazine article Public Finance

Home Is Where Your Wealth Is

Article excerpt

Modern British politics has been about incomes. If real incomes are rising, so the conventional wisdom goes, then the government will be sitting pretty whatever else it is messing up. If they are falling, Pericles himself would struggle to maintain popular support.

This autumn, however, we have seen a switch to a new kind of politics: the politics of assets.

On the back of rising house prices, many people suddenly find themselves well-off. The average housing wealth of someone aged 55-64 has risen by £98,000 to £240,000 over the past ten years, according to an excellent new paper on asset accumulation by James Lloyd of the International Longevity Centre.

You might think that being rich would be an opportunity for the newly wealthy to share their good fortune with their fellow citizens. After all, making loadsamoney by sitting on your sofa at home hardly requires the incentive of economic reward.

Taxes on such unearned gains used, therefore, to be favoured by economists over taxes on income.

That's what economics may say but the politics is completely the reverse. Basking in their affluence, the newly wealthy are in fact more determined than ever to keep their money, if not for themselves, then for their children.

Hence the great inheritance tax drama: Conservative opportunism and Labour funk, leading to a handout from Alistair Darling which has the wealthy dancing in the streets. Hence the row over capital gains tax, where the government's proposals had immediately to be revised to make them less onerous on the already very wealthy.

The new wealth has one undesirable characteristic: it is very unevenly distributed. The top one per cent of the population has a quarter of it, while most at the bottom of the income distribution have no or little wealth at all.

So it follows that the tax reliefs are adding to inequality. The inheritance tax concession may have been politically inevitable but it is also economically damaging and socially and morally demeaning.

If we go on like this, the divide between the haves and the have-nots will widen - and, worse, inequality will be perpetuated down through the generations. There can be no genuine equality of opportunity, such as all political parties now affect to want, when some people start with so much more in prospective wealth than others.

However, the asset revolution also presents some opportunities. While much worry has gone into the provision of pensions for Britain's ageing population, asset appreciation has been quietly solving much of the problem. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.