Magazine article The American Conservative

Hard Cases

Magazine article The American Conservative

Hard Cases

Article excerpt

[JUSTICE]

While the California Supreme Court imposed same-sex marriage on the Golden State, so far this season the U.S. Supreme Court has not had to confront contentious social issues. That's not to say recent decisions-including Boumediene and Dada-have not showcased how divided the high court remains. These two rulings, the most notable so far this year (as of press time), both split the court 5-4, with Roberts, Alito, Scalia, and Thomas dissenting from the liberal majority on each occasion.

These rulings have done more than illustrate the court's philosophical division, however. They also remind us that there is plenty of room for thoughtful conservatives to question the wisdom of the dissenting justices, and that the court's liberals are not always radical. John McCain disagrees: he called Boumediene, which extends basic habeas corpus protections to detained "enemy combatants," "one of the worst decisions in the history of the country." But George Will-who challenged the Republican nominee's assertion by reminding readers of Dred Scott, Ptessy, and Korematsu-offered a balanced take in his June 17 column. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.