Magazine article Stanford Social Innovation Review

Medicare Saves Lives

Magazine article Stanford Social Innovation Review

Medicare Saves Lives

Article excerpt


For decades, Americans have squabbled over whether the government should expand Medicare, maintain its current scope, or cut it altogether. But their debates have suffered for lack of an answer to one vital question: Does Medicare make a difference?

A new study shows that Medicare indeed makes a difference for seriously ill patients - and that difference is the one between life and death. Following the fates of more than 400,000 people admitted to California hospitals through their emergency departments, a team of economists finds that patients who are just over 65 years old - and thus eligible for Medicare - are 20 percent less likely to the within a week of admission than are their slightly younger counterparts who do not yet qualify for the government insurance.

"Until this paper, no one thought that health insurance of any kind affected something as straightforward as death rates," says David Card, a professor of economics at the University of California, Berkeley, and the study's lead author. "Fact is, if you show up at the hospital without insurance, they'll take you in and give you fairly decent treatment."

But the Medicare-eligible set seems to get somewhat better treatment, Card and his colleagues find. Their study reveals that patients between 65 and 70 have more procedures and higher bills than do patients between 60 and 64, hinting that Medicare-aged patients are receiving more care. This closer attention may give Medicare recipients an edge on surviving their trip to the ER, Card says.

Card's study also suggests that Medicare recipients fare better than not only the uninsured, but also the privately insured. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.