Magazine article Eye : The International Review of Graphic Design

The Artful Charm of the Public Notice

Magazine article Eye : The International Review of Graphic Design

The Artful Charm of the Public Notice

Article excerpt

Big, bad, bold and subverted by artists and designers, the public notice returns power to the people, writes Rob Giampietro

Susan Sontag, in her 1970 essay on posters (first published in The Art of Revolution: 96 Posters from Cuba), makes a distinction between the public notice - one of the earliest forms of graphic design - and the poster.

'Both posters and public notices address the person ... as an unidentified member of the body politic,' she writes. 'But the poster, as distinct from the public notice, presupposes the modern concept of the public - in which the members of a society are defined primarily as spectators or consumers. A public notice aims to inform or command. A poster aims to seduce, to exhort, to sell, to educate, to convince, to appeal.' Implicit in Sontag's argument is a claim about the way information is shaped. The form of the public notice is neutral, while the poster's is inflected.

Originally developed as 'an extension of the power of the ruler' (as Maurice Rickards noted in the 1970s), the public notice, this grandfather to the poster, still retains a sense of authority. Until the spread of mass literacy, such notices had to be read aloud - often to the sound of trumpets - before they were posted. Rickards notes that through such fanfare 'the document came to be seen as a tangible contact with the very will and person of the ruler himself'. Some of the earliest printed notices even camouflaged the fact of their mass production, to make it seem as if the ruler himself had written the document. Thus the notice's arrival and posting was tantamount to the ruler's own arrival; its words created seemingly by his own hand. The King was the Law, and now the Law was the Word. In time, the people came to understand and accept this.

It's not surprising that, having consented to the power of the Word, the people would eventually want that power back. Flipping through the 'Forms of Inquiry' catalogue a while ago, I stopped to reflect on Mevis and van Deursen's contribution, which appropriates rules sent out to teachers and students at the Gerrit Rietveld Academy each year for proper treatment of their historic building (shown above right).

Essentially, this is a notice that forbids its own posting. The act is not a futile one; it is surely a comment on the condition of having to work within a living monument and the creative struggles created as a result. But, aside from the language, Armand Mevis and Linda van Deursen have appropriated something else: artist Lawrence Weiner's trademark use of Franklin Gothic Extra Condensed (see 'The work must be read', Eye no. 29 vol. 8). They have also dropped a fourth rule from the original text, to better echo Weiner's statements, which so often come in threes.

When Weiner's 1969 work A Series of Stakes Set in the Ground... was damaged, he decided that the work's essence rested in its verbal formulation, not its physical implementation. He began to see that his medium for sculpture could be language itself; that language alone was sufficient for communicating his ideas. In the same year, artist Joseph Kosuth published his essay 'Art After Philosophy'. Kosuth explains that 'artness' is a criteria and that Duchamp's strategy, employed with his Readymades, of simply declaring: 'This is a work of art', was enough to activate that criteria. Art could exist as a simple declaration or assignation, a public notice. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.