Magazine article The Spectator

Folding Money

Magazine article The Spectator

Folding Money

Article excerpt

When politicians devalue the currency, hard assets are the answer

Forget Bernie Madoff. The biggest Ponzi scheme in history is unfolding before your very eyes. If you have money in the bank, you will be a victim.

The rot set in on 15 August 1971. That was the date on which the Nixon administration, reeling from the costs of the Vietnam war, unilaterally took the dollar 'off gold', ending fixed convertibility between the US currency and the precious metal. From that day to this, the currencies of the world have been backed by nothing more substantial than politicians' promises.

It was not always thus. Throughout history, man has used a variety of things as money, including cattle, shells, tobacco and cotton. But over time, precious metals won out over all their rivals on account of their scarcity, durability and beauty. Paper money itself is a comparatively recent phenomenon.

We use it today as a matter of course and convenience. But unbacked paper ('fiat') money is a distinctly modern experiment, and one that looks set to end in tears.

As the second protagonist in today 's Ponzi scheme, enter the banks. The modern banking system operates on what is called a fractional reserve basis: only a fraction of a bank's deposits are kept as liquid reserves.

The rest are lent out, re-deposited, and relent elsewhere. This mechanism normally works tolerably well, though in the event of a systemic loss of confidence, it has the unfortunate side-effect of bank runs, as the example of Northern Rock testifies.

There is one huge side -effect of fiat money and fractional reserve banking, however: inflation. Monetary purists point out that inflation is not just defined as a rise in the prices of goods and services; rather, it is the rise in the money supply that tends to ignite the rising prices. To generate inflation, in other words, merely let politicians and central bankers print money and let their banker friends create more. Paper money in conjunction with fractional reserve banking is inherently inflationary. Former US Fed chairman Alan Greenspan admitted as much in 2005: 'We can guarantee cash benefits as far out and at whatever size you like, but we cannot guarantee their purchasing power.' In other words, central bankers can print as much money as you want - just don't expect it to be worth anything.

In The Ethics of Money Production , Professor Jorg Guido Hulsmann argues that our monetary institutions 'allow an alliance of politicians and bankers to enrich themselves at the expense of all other strata of society'. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.