Magazine article The Spectator

The Fascist Vote

Magazine article The Spectator

The Fascist Vote

Article excerpt

Public responses to the riots show a disturbing appetite for authoritarian politics in Britain

At the age of 72, I begin to wonder, for the first time in my life, if there might be a future for a fascist party in Britain. The thought has been provoked by the riots, or rather the response of many to them.

The riots themselves were horrible, an outburst of callous criminality, doubtless enjoyable for those who took part in it. Yet they were comparatively unimportant. To say this is not to pretend that they weren't frightening, that people weren't killed, or that other victims did not suffer injury or damage to their property. Nevertheless, disturbances of this kind have happened before, and will happen again. Sometimes a fuse is lit, in this case by the shooting of Mark Duggan by the police, and then the tinder-box explodes. Happily the rioting subsided quite quickly, as was predictable. Such things normally fizzle out, though they may well flare up again.

Some of the reaction was at least as worrying . A Conservative MEP, Roger Helmer, sent out a tweet: 'Time to get tough.

Bring in the army. Shoot rioters and looters.' Given that we are engaged in military action in Libya to prevent Colonel Gaddafi from using violence on his own people, as the Foreign Secretary and others have put it, this call to shoot our people in the streets of London was both intemperate and hypocritical. It was also remarkably stupid. A riot set off by the police shooting of one man was more likely to be enflamed than quelled by shooting a few more, especially if the victims were teenagers.

Daniel Knowles, assistant comment editor on the Daily Telegraph, pointed this out in a well-reasoned blogpost, and wrote that someone who thought like Helmer had, in his opinion, no place in a modern Conservative party. This stirred things up.

One contributor wrote: 'Three cheers for Roger Helmer - finally some proper Conservative thinking.' Shooting young criminals without trial - is this 'proper Conservative thinking'? Another declared Helmer should be prime minister. Another wrote that it was because of people like Knowles that 'the Conservative party did not win an outright majority at the last election'. Yet another said that Helmer had at least been elected, while nobody had elected Knowles to express his views. Actually, of course, he is employed as a journalist to do just this on the Telegraph's comment pages and blogs; but hatred of a free press is characteristic of fascism.

The rioters were mostly young people whose actions deserve condemnation, but whose situation should inspire pity and sympathy from those of us in more fortunate circumstances. They got neither from Knowles's critics - Helmer's admirers . They were denounced as 'feral scum', 'vermin' , 'feckless wasters', 'little shits'. 'If the police were allowed to shoot these scum, there would be a lot less about.' One writer , deciding - sadly? - that the rioters wouldn't be shot, suggested they should be flogged. Another recommended 20 years' 'hard labour'.

Now let us admit that the writers were afraid and indignant, and that some of them may be stupid. Unfortunately, fascism has always appealed to the fearful, the indignant, and the stupid. Fascism feeds on resentment and rancour. It sets up 'the other' as an object of hatred - Jews or blacks or 'feral scum': 'vermin' is a word the Nazis applied to the Jews. Here we see a comparable hatred directed at the young - whether the ill-educated 'feral scum' or overeducated liberal Oxbridge graduates, ignorant of 'real life': a charge directed in insulting language at Daniel Knowles. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.