Magazine article Screen International

On the Audience and UK Films

Magazine article Screen International

On the Audience and UK Films

Article excerpt

In light of the Film Policy Review, remembering that you can't force audiences to watch a film they don't want to watch; and noting how the UK benefits from US box-office domination.

Everybody appeared happy at the publication of the film policy review this week, perhaps not surprisingly bearing in mind that a whopping 56 recommendations were made that satisfied just about every constituency.Aside from my natural cynicism that all of these recommendations could ever be realized - especially in an already overstreched BFI infrastructure - I can't help but feel a certain déjà vu with some of the key determinations. "It's all about the audience" was the headline of the report, which pledged to connect British film with audiences "at the cinema and on every conceivable digital device."Connect them you may, but you cannot force somebody to watch a film they don't want to watch. Even if you compel Sky and ITV to invest in British films, there is no guarantee that they will find a bigger audience for the films they invest in than anybody else. Likewise if you put the entire Powell/Pressburger oeuvre on the national school curriculum to start audience education early. Or put British films on six screens of every multiplex. Or bundle producers with distributors, as this review suggests, and as the UKFC attempted in its Lottery franchise scheme - to no avail. More British films doesn't mean an increased market share, as the Section 48 deluge demonstrated.The UK does not - and will never - have an industrial movie system like the US which now routinely spends half a billion dollars to produce and market single films as part of "four-quadrant" franchises. Audiences religiously go to see them, because they have been tailored by industrial engines to please them.Even the bigger independent distributors in the UK spend the lion's share of their budgets on buying and releasing US-made movies, not on UK production - which would often be much cheaper. The UK, after all, does not consistently and routinely make films that UK audiences want to see en masse. And before you say anything, yes, I do consider Harry Potter a US studio product, since only a company like Warner Bros could have made it. There are wonderful exceptions, of course, like The King's Speech which ranked second biggest hit of 2011 in the territory, but exceptions they remain - and usually surprises. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.