Magazine article Tate Etc.

A Liberation from the Ordinary

Magazine article Tate Etc.

A Liberation from the Ordinary

Article excerpt

Peter Fraser at Tate St Ives - A basket of crayons, a colourful conch, a pile of berries, two blue buckets on the floor. Peter Fraser's photographs of everyday objects, interiors and scenes, many of which will be included in Tate St Ives's forthcoming exhibition, may look simple enough, but for one writer they are ful I of resonance

A plate of redcurrants on an old, prosaically weather-beaten table. The plate- blue and white, with formal Chinese motifs - would seem to be Willow pattern, and the light in the image appears to come from the objects themselves, especially from the berries, all of which suggests one of those old still-life paintings we take so readily for granted, something by Adriaen Coorte, say, orChardin's Wicker Basket with Wild Strawberries of 1761. Yet this is a contemporary image, a photograph by Peter Fraser, one of a series of pictures in which a washing line in a snowy backyard, or two empty buckets - one pale blue, the other somewhat darker - set side by side on the floor of what might be a school or a community centre, are transformed into reminders that, as we go about our day-to-day business, we miss almost all there is of actual, physical reality in our lives.

The missing is, of course, deliberate, or at least predetermined: we have better things to do than to stop and take stock of where and what we are. Yet while it may seem frivolous to say so in the current climate (though, of course, there is always a "current climate" of one kind or another), the fact remains that our foremost, and mostly neglected first imperative is to make the key distinction between the mundane (the governed, the preordained, the authorised) and the quotidian (the wild, the immediate, the erotic), for this is the first step in refusing to be governed, the first step in imagining a world that nobody owns.

So, while it would be easy to pretend that Fraser's work is apolitical, I would suggest that nothing could be further from the truth: for, as with Dutch still life or the domestic scenes of Chardin's most intimate work, a strange, yet essential democratising force can be discerned in his oeuvre. As we peer into his illumined, sometimes child's-eye-view pictures of scale models and berries and abandoned toys, we are reminded that we are all of us equals in the chambers of our imagery, and that it is only the mundane world that assigns us positions and pay grades. In the immediacy of the quotidian, no one's experience is more or less vivid than another's, even if it remains unsayable.

Il y aun autre monde, mais il est dans celui-ci, says Paul Éluard, which is to say that, behind the veil of the mundane, the quotidian endures, whether it be in the roseate, deeply erotic curve of a seashell, the forlorn quality of an old grocer's scale in the corner of what might or might not be an empty room, or a stack of breeze blocks that somehow suggest, in theirtranslucent violet wrapping, a long-lost pharaonic mystery that, even if it no longer exists in the mythical "real world", remains encoded in the viewer's prehistoric self.

Fraser's work constantly undermines our assumptions about that Realworld (constructed playground of received ideas and invested power, sanctuary of the hidebound, the limbo state of a long ossified yet oddly stubborn Authorised Version, pressed upon us from birth by those charged with rationalising our behaviour- parents, teachers, policemen, our supposed peers), and no matter how poignant the gap between the quotidian and the mundane may be, we are reminded that it is possible to cross over at any time into an autremonde that is neither misty nor ill-defined. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.