Magazine article The Spectator

The Bottom-Up Approach

Magazine article The Spectator

The Bottom-Up Approach

Article excerpt

Confronting the Classics by Mary Beard Prole Books, £25, pp. 310, ISBN 9781781250488 The Emperor Augustus, ruler of the known world, once spotted a man in the street who looked a bit like himself. 'Did your mother ever work at the palace?' he asked him roguishly. 'No, ' the man replied, 'but my father did.' Augustus could have had the man killed for this scurrilous (and slightly surreal) insinuation, but fortunately he had a sense of humour.

As too, Mary Beard tells us, did the Emperor Elagabalus, who used to seat his dinner guests on cushions that, unbeknownst to them, were full of air. As the meal progressed, a slave secretly let the air out, so Elagabalus could enjoy the sight of his companions subsiding, until they slid beneath the table.

While sharing the first of these anecdotes in Confronting the Classics, the author praises Augustus for his ability to laugh at himself. Yet there's little doubt where her real sympathies lie - here, as elsewhere, they're with the man in the street. Professor of Classics at Cambridge, literary journalist and TV presenter, Beard has several professional modes, but all favour what she calls a 'bottom-up' approach to her subject.

Writing about Ancient Rome, for instance, she focuses less on the palaces and pavilions of the mighty than on the bars and bordellos of the meek. More generally, she challenges orthodoxy, with often exhilarating results.

In her chapter on Boadicea, she mentions the account in which it was the British queen's flogging by Romans that prompted her revenge. But she also gives space to Cassius Dio's version, whereby the rebellion was caused by economic crisis. According to Dio, Boadicea's soldiers cut off the breasts of Roman women and sewed them into their mouths. Why? So they'd look as if they were eating them. 'Even the most glamorous rebels, ' Beard concludes, 'are just as unappealing, under the surface, as the imperialist tyrants themselves.'

Yet in her world view, tyrants too deserve a rational appraisal. When Caligula made his horse consul, she says, it wasn't necessarily madness. He may have been making a satirical point, implying his horse could do as good a job as the asses surrounding him.

Alexander the Great comes off less well - as a drunken, psychotic child. Some have called this verdict anachronistic, reflecting Beard's modern mindset, but as she points out, it can't entirely be dismissed as such, when one reflects that a similar view was expressed by Lucan, for one. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.