Magazine article Times Educational Supplement

'Portraits' of Inspectors Paper over the Cracks at Ofsted, Heads Warn: News

Magazine article Times Educational Supplement

'Portraits' of Inspectors Paper over the Cracks at Ofsted, Heads Warn: News

Article excerpt

Watchdog under fire for failing to publish key information.

Ofsted has been accused of failing to fulfil its promise to be "open and transparent" about the backgrounds of its inspectors, prompting concern from heads that schools are being given the wrong ratings by inexperienced staff.

In an embarrassing series of revelations last year, Ofsted was forced to admit that it did not hold simple information about its inspectors' teaching experience. One of the private firms it uses admitted that some of its inspectors did not hold even basic teaching qualifications.

The watchdog said it would rectify the situation by publishing "pen portraits" on its website, but these have come under fire from heads for lacking key information. They do not include the names of schools where inspectors worked, the judgements they received and when they last taught in the classroom.

Brian Lightman, general secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL), said the information failed to reassure schools that they were being judged by qualified inspectors. "The key issue is for all inspectors to have credibility, but the quality of these teams is very variable," he said. "This could lead to schools receiving the wrong inspection grades."

Mr Lightman's comments follow criticism of inspectors from education secretary Michael Gove, who told the ASCL's annual conference last week that "some of those who carry out inspections for Ofsted need to raise their game". Conference delegates also heard a plea from chief inspector Sir Michael Wilshaw for more serving heads to sign up to work for the inspectorate.

Stephen Ball, headteacher of the New Charter Academy in Ashton-under-Lyne, Greater Manchester, who first demanded more transparency about the backgrounds of inspectors, said the information released did not go far enough.

"Ofsted has long been reluctant to acknowledge in public an inconvenient truth: it has too few inspectors with the credibility that comes from having successfully led our largest and most challenging secondary schools," Mr Ball said.

The pen portraits sounded like "celebrity snapshots in a theatre programme", which "conceal as much as they reveal", Mr Ball added. "This may be something of a step in the right direction, but it is a faltering and unconvincing one."

Last April, TES revealed how Mr Ball's request for information about Her Majesty's Inspectors - those directly employed by Ofsted - had forced the watchdog to admit that it did not know how many had led an outstanding school, or whether they had worked in primaries or secondaries. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.