Magazine article The Presidency

Handling Hazing

Magazine article The Presidency

Handling Hazing

Article excerpt

About three years ago I was sued over a hazing incident. The specter of hazing has touched much of my career in academe, from working in Greek life to serving as a chief student affairs officer. In 2000, I received my first request to be an expert witness in a case involving a hazing death. Since that time, I have done so more than 25 times.

With hazing regularly in the headlines in recent years, perhaps it was inevitable that I, in my current role as a college president, would be taken to court for an alleged hazing incident on my own campus. The courts will ultimately decide whether the incident actually constituted hazing (I emphatically believe it did not), but in the meantime I've reached another kind of conclusion: If this could happen to me, it could happen to just about anyone.

What can be done to prevent such a crisis? As college and university presidents know all too well, it is virtually impossible for one individual or institution to truly and completely prevent hazing. That is what makes it one of the most frustrating (and enduring) challenges facing our institutions.

Hazing has existed in American higher education since the mid-1800s. It began as a "rite of passage" for college and university freshmen, and starting in the 1920s spread to fraternities, sororities, athletic teams, and even bands.

Despite repeated attempts, students have yet to embrace any activity designed to replace these often dangerous rituals, which are intended to help newcomers earn their place in a certain group (not to mention giving established members the satisfaction of lording power over newer ones). The complexity of the issue is illustrated by research, which has confirmed that rites of passage are an important step on the road to developing identity.

So the essence of the question remains: how should administrators handle hazing, or work to minimize it? Let's start with prevention efforts. First, you must have talented student affairs professionals, especially the chief student affairs officer. Devastating budget cuts in recent years have reduced student affairs staffs and resources. Often these offices are moved under academic affairs. This structure can mean that the chief student affairs officer is not at the table for crucial discussions about student life. In some cases, the position is eliminated altogether. This is a mistake. The best way to stop hazing before it starts is to employ student affairs experts who stay engaged on the topic both on campus and nationally.

Each year, administrators should ask student affairs leaders about hazing prevention efforts. There should be annual training for students in high-risk groups like fraternities, sororities, clubs, athletic teams, and now bands, as well as special sessions for students who aspire to join or have recently joined one of these groups. If possible, the campus president should set the tone for these meetings by speaking to students about expectations and the institution's position on hazing.

In addition, every college and university should periodically review its hazing-related protocols, including investigations and sanctions. Part of this review is a conversation among senior leaders about appropriate sanctions. The phrase "zero tolerance" is widely used, so much so that it no longer has a great deal of meaning on its own. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.