Magazine article The Times Higher Education Supplement : THE

Panorama Put LSE 'Bystanders' at Risk: Letters

Magazine article The Times Higher Education Supplement : THE

Panorama Put LSE 'Bystanders' at Risk: Letters

Article excerpt

Tim Luckhurst is incorrect to claim that the London School of Economics' stance on the BBC Panorama programme "North Korea Undercover" was based on a "reverence for bureaucracy" or "wounded pride" ("NK confidential: BBC correctly balanced consent and complicity", Opinion, 25 April). It is the BBC, rather than the LSE, that lost perspective.

As scholars based at the LSE, we have conducted years of fieldwork in dangerous parts of the world, including war zones. Finding ways to do this kind of research is challenging and sometimes it is necessary to take risks. However, there is a line that should not be crossed. Taking risks in relation to our own lives is one thing: knowingly jeopardising the lives and liberty of others is another.

While we have great admiration for bold investigative journalism, we find the BBC's willingness to put what it calls "bystanders" in harm's way quite extraordinary. Luckhurst does not seem to agree. We do not know any other academic researcher who would take such a cavalier attitude, and we have found it depressing listening to senior BBC management justifying the actions of John Sweeney and his team. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.