Magazine article The Times Higher Education Supplement : THE

Letters

Magazine article The Times Higher Education Supplement : THE

Letters

Article excerpt

Appropriate accommodation?

Martin McQuillan ("Selective hearing", Features, 8 May) ignores those facts about the student occupations at the University of Sussex that do not fit his narrative. For instance, in March last year several thousand people were called to a demonstration in support of the occupation through posters that invited them to "fuck things up". Subsequently, a number of protesters smashed glass doors, burned records, wrecked furniture, intimidated staff and stole cash and personal property from desks. I doubt that he would tolerate such acts at Kingston University or that he would consider such behaviour "idealistic".

John Duffy

Registrar and secretary

University of Sussex

Martin McQuillan states the choices for universities clearly. They can either develop as consumer organisations that must recognise student concerns (at least to some extent) to survive. Or they can develop as authoritarian regimes that massage student opinion to retain their privileges. Neither path is delightful. But at present, as they are not resolving this dilemma, they will be caught on its horns.

Stephen Haggard

Via timeshighereducation.co.uk

It's right to warn of the managerialist co-option of the student voice ("The students are no longer revolting", Feature, 8 May), where obedient students are encouraged to speak but are not necessarily listened to. But I can't agree with Joanna Williams and Jennie Bristow when they say: "For students, the aspiration to be the intellectual equals of their lecturers and critically engaged in the search for new knowledge or the reinterpretation of existing knowledge is entirely laudable. But this should be a privilege students earn after having engaged in an intellectual struggle to master the foundations of a discipline." (My emphasis.)

It is a right for students: the right to be agents of their own development, the right to be "partners, co-creators and experts" involved with "training staff in new skills...designing curricula and resources - negotiating examination questions...setting assignments, redesigning module provision and delivery", to adopt the language of the Quality Assurance Agency.

The latter may well be said in managerialist bad faith, but that doesn't make it wrong per se.

Julian Wells

Via timeshighereducation.co.uk

Martin McQuillan says occupations distract students from their primary purpose - study. I disagree. I spent significant periods of my first degree course in occupation of college premises. It taught me skills of organising, public speaking and publicity that I would not have learned in lectures and that have stayed with me since.

Keith Flett

London

Mothers of contention

It was disappointing to see such a negative portrayal of higher education institutions as employers in the article "Disappointing pitter-patter of tiny pay packets" (News, 8 May). The article overlooked the fact that employers in the sector offer far better maternity pay and conditions than is offered across the whole economy.

Research by the Universities and Colleges Employers Association shows that 95 per cent of higher education institutions offer maternity pay well in excess of the statutory minimum. Of course the conditions may vary across the sector, but there is still a stark contrast with the findings of the survey by XpertHR that only 55 per cent of UK employers provided anything above the statutory level of maternity pay. A similar IDS survey found that only 61 per cent of organisations exceeded the statutory level of maternity pay. Furthermore, the vast majority of those that offer any enhanced maternity pay (75 per cent for XpertHR, 83 per cent for IDS) restrict eligibility to employees with a minimum length of service.

Helen Fairfoul

Chief executive

Universities and Colleges Employers Association

Animals in open light

It is a great shame that Michelle Thew from the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection (Letters, 8 May) seeks to pour scorn on universities' moves to be more open about the animal research they conduct. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.