Magazine article The Spectator

Free Jaffrey Archer Now

Magazine article The Spectator

Free Jaffrey Archer Now

Article excerpt

Jeffrey Archer, the disgraced peer, should be let out of prison as soon as he would be if he were Joe Bloggs, the disgraced dustman. In July 2001 Archer was given a four-year sentence for perjury and perverting the course of justice, so in a few weeks' time he will become eligible for parole. It could be said it is absurd that prisoners should be eligible for release after serving only half their sentences, but the fact that prison has become a devalued currency cannot reasonably be blamed on Archer. If he satisfies the Parole Board's conditions for early release, he should be set free.

Within the past few days a rather odd story has appeared in the press. The Sunday Mirror printed a memo from John Gieve, permanent secretary at the Home Office, to Martin Narey, the commissioner for Correctional Services, which said, 'Given the amount of press interest in Archer and the difficulties this has caused the Home Secretary and your department, we are keen to see that Archer is not immediately released at the halfway point of the sentence.' A Home Office spokesman later said, 'This letter appears to be a forgery.' The use of the word 'appears' in this context is curious: surely the Home Office is able to establish whether the letter is a forgery or not. But the political value of the leak, or forgery, or whatever it was, to the Home Secretary, David Blunkett, was clear. The idea had been put into circulation that, as far as he was concerned, he would be delighted to see Archer rot in jail for ever.

Mr Blunkett is a politician, and one who has never been shy to articulate the prejudices of the saloon bar. He knows how little faith Labour's working-class supporters, or ex-supporters, have in the judicial system. The problem lies not in Mr Blunkett's feel for public opinion, on which he should be congratulated, but in the way he seeks to deflect criticism from himself by finding convenient scapegoats. The judges are one such target and Archer seems set to become another.

So it is perhaps worth setting out the reasons why it would be a good idea to release Archer now. The first reason is that vindictiveness should not be elevated into a guiding principle for the way we run our penal system. It is easy to be nasty about Archer, and in some ways it is also a pleasure, for this wretched fantasist has behaved in such a mendacious way, and is so insufferably pleased with himself, and has such a penchant for manipulating and bullying those he considers vulnerable to manipulation and bullying. Having demonstrated that one can become intimate with a great part of the British establishment simply by offering them the chance to consume free champagne and shepherd's pie while talking to important people, Archer is frankly an embarrassment. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.