Magazine article The CPA Journal

Constructive Dialogue for the Public Good

Magazine article The CPA Journal

Constructive Dialogue for the Public Good

Article excerpt

A bill that New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer submitted to the State Legislature in January focuses on preventing fraud in nonprofit organizations and therefore will affect the clients of many NYSSCPA members as well as nonprofit organizations that they serve in a volunteer capacity. This bill also potentially affects every New Yorker, because we all benefit from the work of the state's thousands of nonprofits in the areas of education, health, welfare, and public service.

The Attorney General's Charities Bureau is responsible for supervising charitable organizations and for protecting donors and beneficiaries from unscrupulous practices in the solicitation and management of charitable assets. The bureau also supervises the activities of foundations and other charities to ensure they use their funds and other property properly, and it monitors the registration of charitable organizations as mandated by law.

Spitzer's philosophy, as expressed at the NYSSCPA Nonprofit Conference in January, is that government should get more heavily involved when it becomes apparent that the existing checks and balances are no longer enough. The NYSSCPA shares Spitzer's and the Charities Bureau's desire for improvement, but we also recognize and feel strongly that any new legislation should consider all of its potential results. This is not the same as preserving the status quo. The Society endorses and supports many aspects of the nonprofit fraud proposal.

Providing Input, Being Heard

Twice in the weeks following Spitzer's introduction of this proposed legislation, members of the NYSSCPA's Not-for-Profit Organizations Committee met with Charities Bureau representatives to discuss various aspects of the bill and to provide input. The Society drafted a detailed comment letter, which offered specific language in many areas. When the Attorney General's office issued a revised proposal in May, we could see where our input had made a positive difference.

One point of Spitzer's original proposal that concerned the NYSSCPA is that it would apply strict financial reporting standards to nonprofits with annual gross revenues of $250,000 or more. We recommended that the size at which having executive employees manage the organization's affairs and formal internal controls makes sense would be $5 million in revenues or more. Internal control is just as important in smaller organizations, but inevitably it depends more on board members' personal involvement and less on formal systems. A $250,000 threshold was simply too low, and the revised threshold of $1 million indicates that the bill's drafters recognized the merits of our analysis. For similar reasons, we also recommended raising the threshold requirement for the establishment of an executive committee and audit committee from the proposed $250,000 to $5 million, our stance being that because some nonprofits do not solicit public contributions and therefore are not audited, this requirement should apply only to nonprofits required to have an audit. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.