Magazine article Times Educational Supplement

'Trust in Teachers to Make Our Nation Science-Literate'

Magazine article Times Educational Supplement

'Trust in Teachers to Make Our Nation Science-Literate'

Article excerpt

Star physicist Brian Cox says staff should get more autonomy

Professor Brian Cox has used his skills as an academic and a presenter to make science accessible and popular for a primetime TV audience. Now he wants the UK to go a step further and become "scientifically literate". And he believes it is schools that can make the difference.

Professor Cox set out his recipe for improving science education in an exclusive TES interview. He revealed that he wants to see changes in the subjects pupils study and greater trust placed in teachers. He also spoke of his concerns about the assessment of practical science work.

Top of his checklist is a shift back to the individual science GCSEs taken by a declining proportion of pupils as combined science becomes more popular. He believes that for people to gain a deeper understanding of science, the subjects of biology, chemistry and physics should be studied separately up to the age of 16.

Not only would this better prepare young people for further scientific study, Professor Cox said, but it would also equip a generation with the tools necessary to understand the big policy decisions the public will face across many different areas in the future.

"I think there's some evidence that students do better at science when they do all the subjects separately," Professor Cox explained. "There are two things here: one is we want to produce the scientists and engineers of tomorrow, so we need to make sure students are inspired and have the right skills to go on and do A-levels and go on to universities, or go and do an apprenticeship. But there's also a desire to make a generally scientifically literate population. And that's really important because the big policy decisions that we face are almost entirely, or can be entirely, informed by evidence.

"We're asking questions about health policy, or education policy, or climate change or energy policy or whatever - the idea that you understand what evidence is, how you acquire it and how you should weight it and deploy it is very important. I think that's the most important thing about a scientific education. That's what it's about, really."

The rise of combined science

This summer, nearly 400,000 candidates sat combined science GCSEs, compared with fewer than 140,000 in the separate sciences. And the gap is growing: combined science entries are up by 6.2 per cent compared with 2014, while entries to biology, chemistry and physics dropped by 1.8 per cent, 3.3 per cent and 2.6 per cent respectively.

Richard Spencer, an award-winning head of science at Middlesbrough College, said he agreed that separate sciences led to a better understanding of the subjects. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.