Magazine article Times Educational Supplement

The Management Mentor

Magazine article Times Educational Supplement

The Management Mentor

Article excerpt

Breaking the budget

In most organisations, there's usually no getting away from the annual budgeting cycle. It determines everything from staff pay all the way down to how many tea bags are in the communal kitchen.

Yet for how much longer might this be the case? Unilever, the multinational consumer goods company, Handelsbanken, a major Swedish bank, and Statoil, the Norwegian oil and gas producer, all claim to have completely abandoned (or significantly marginalised) their budgets. Will this catch on in schools?

Arguments against budgets include: constraint on an organisation's responsiveness; that they are a deterrent to change and underline a "backward-looking" perspective rather than a more strategic outlook; and that budgeting can be time-consuming and costly.

We've probably all experienced some of these adverse effects. One that sometimes affects me in the university sector is how expenditure is held back through most of a financial year because the budget is "not looking great", but then funds get released towards the end of it when things look better financially.

Another not-so-popular characteristic of the traditional budgeting cycle is the length of time between when a budget is devised and the end of a financial year. Frequently, budget figures at the end of a financial year can be in place and fixed for as long as 15 months.

Traditional budgeting is a reliable management tool when an organisation operates in a stable and generally predictable environment. Stability and predictability are, however, rare commodities today - as an extreme example, just think about the usefulness of Volkswagen's budgets after the emissions scandal. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.