Magazine article The Spectator

We Have Never Been Closer to State Control of the Press

Magazine article The Spectator

We Have Never Been Closer to State Control of the Press

Article excerpt

I must confess that I have not watched the development of Ofcom with the care I should have. In the distance I heard the voices of colleagues muttering that the new media regulator would interfere in the freedom of the press, but I chose not to listen. I thought that Ofcom, as the successor of the Independent Television Commission, the Radio Authority, the Broadcasting Standards Commission, Oftel and the Radio Communications Agency, would concern itself with issues which do not on the whole concern the rest of us very much. Dear reader, I have let you down.

Ofcom opened for business on 29 December with a spanking new office and an enormous staff. The first thing we learnt was that the regulator had awarded more than 70 of its staff contracts worth more than £100,000 a year in pay and perks. This was significantly in excess of Ofcom's earlier estimates. Evidently this new arm of the state will be quite a little gravy train. Lord Currie, the chairman, and, it so happens, a good friend of Gordon Brown's, will be paid £133,000 a year for a four-day week. Stephen Carter, the regulator's chief executive, receives £250,000 a year.

Well, let's not get too worked up about other people's salaries. Much more disturbing are the draft guidelines governing newspaper takeovers which, without beating about the bush, Ofcom has already issued. Imagine that a company wishes to take over a newspaper group. To be more precise, imagine that the newspaper group owns the Daily Telegraph, the Sunday Telegraph and The Spectator, titles which may shortly be on the auction block. In that event, Ofcom has a duty to advise the secretary of State for Trade and Industry on whether the acquisition is in the public interest.

Fair enough, you may say. The state has a legitimate interest in tiying to ensure that no single publishing group dominates any newspaper sector in this country. (This is not a duty which previous governments have discharged with much success. In 1981 Rupert Murdoch was allowed by the Tories to buy the Sunday Times and the Times, thereby increasing his share of the national newspaper market defined by circulation to well over 30 per cent.) But it is one thing to attempt to hold the line against monopoly in any area of commerce - a job done by the old Monopolies Commission which has been succeeded by the Competition Commission - quite another to become involved in the editorial policies of newspaper groups.

Ofcom's draft document shows that it will take a minute interest in the content of newspapers. Where two groups propose to merge, the regulator will require detailed information about 'column inches dedicated to advertising, regional/local stories, sport, human interest stories, features, etc.'. It will want to know about 'the current level of contact' between a proprietor and his editor and other senior members of staff, and 'the likely level of involvement of proprietors in editorial decisions'. The regulator will also expect to be told whether a buyer of a newspaper intends to retain 'the existing editor and reporting staff, and it will want to know 'what arrangements are envisaged for ensuring accurate presentation of news'.

Some people have suggested that these and other exacting tests may make it more difficult for Richard Desmond, owner of Express Newspapers, to acquire the Telegraph titles. His autocratic habits, his fondness for dismissing staff and possibly his record as a pornographer might count against him. Naturally I would be very glad to see Ofcom rejecting Mr Desmond, but reasons invoked to disqualify him might be directed against more deserving parties, not only in the auction for the Telegraph Group but in other future bids. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.