Magazine article Business Credit

Taking the Risk out of Supply Chains

Magazine article Business Credit

Taking the Risk out of Supply Chains

Article excerpt

It's a simple fact of human nature: The minute people fear they may not be able to get their "stuff," they start hoarding whatever's available. On the industry level, notes Stanford Professor Hau Lee, a similar dynamic can occur throughout a supply chain. The result can be huge financial losses from excessive or mismatched inventories, and also a downward spiral of increasing financial risk for everyone from raw material suppliers to manufacturers. What companies both downstream and upstream need, he suggests in a recent research paper, is better sharing of information throughout the supply chain and a good, solid plan B to turn to when trouble strikes distribution channels.

The fact that the movement of goods and supplies throughout the world has been disrupted by incidents such as the Iraq war, the 2003 SARS outbreak, and the 9/11 terrorist attacks, or more localized problems such as the 2002 Longshoremen's strike in California and the 1999 Taiwan earthquake, makes Lee's research very timely. "I started investigating the phenomenon of loss of confidence in the supply chain in 1998. Every time there was a shock to the system, such as with the dot-corn bust and the Y2K panic, companies seemed to overreact, causing drastic up and down cycles," explains Lee, the Thoma Professor of Operations, Information, and Technology.

His paper, "Mitigating Supply Chain Risk Through Improved Confidence," co-authored with Martin Christopher, Professor of Marketing and Logistics at Cranfield University in the UK, draws on numerous case studies he has written since then. Lee has observed that when companies become worried that materials, components, and products will not be delivered on time-or at all-they sometimes revert to inefficient practices such as holding inventory, adding warehouses, padding delivery time to customers, and using lower-quality domestic suppliers instead of top-quality foreign suppliers.

"These are often irrational responses," Lee says. They also can cost money, alienate customers, put companies at risk for financial loss, and create misleading distortions throughout the entire supply chain. One of the most expensive examples is the case of Cisco Systems. Because the company could not keep up with demand for its network infrastructure products throughout the 1990s, all levels in the supply chain buffered themselves by placing additional orders, causing Cisco to inflate its inventory. When actual market demand suddenly declined in 2001, Cisco was left with $2 billion of excess inventory. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.