Magazine article Public Finance

LGPS Retirement Age Data in Doubt

Magazine article Public Finance

LGPS Retirement Age Data in Doubt

Article excerpt

Local government employers have overstated the 'unaffordability' of the status quo in the local government pension scheme by as much as £95m a year, a study commissioned by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has suggested.

Estimates by the Employers' Organisation and pension scheme actuaries on the yearly cost of withdrawing a planned increase in the LGPS retirement age from 60 to 65 have ranged from £200m to £400m.

The estimates have taken centre-stage in the dispute around the LGPS as they have been used by the EO and ODPM to argue that the status quo - in which most scheme members are eligible to retire at 60 - is too expensive to maintain, as people are now living longer.

Yet the ODPM-commissioned study by actuaries Hymans Robertson reveals that the estimates could be out by 25%, as they were based on the flawed assumption that all those eligible to retire at 60 do so.

The study found that, on average, most scheme members remained in full-time work a year later than their 'Earliest Retirement Age' - the date they became eligible to retire on full benefits. For many this will have been 61.

'For those funds that were not anticipating any retirements after ERA, this might reduce the cost of the scheme's accruing benefits for a typical employer by around 2%. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.