Magazine article Tate Etc.

Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose 1885-6

Magazine article Tate Etc.

Carnation, Lily, Lily, Rose 1885-6

Article excerpt

In August 1885 John Singer Sargent was on a boating trip with fellow American artist Edwin Austin Abbey when he glimpsed an enchanting scene in a garden at Pangbourne on the banks of the Thames: children lighting lanterns hung among trees, lilies and rose bushes. He described it to Robert Louis Stevenson as 'a most paradisaic sight', and it became the inspiration for what he came to call his 'big picture'.

During the trip, Sargent injured his head in an accident and Abbey took him to Broadway in the Cotswolds, where the American painter Frank Millet and his wife Lily were living, so that he might convalesce. Broadway was a pastoral idyll, and the Millets were a hospitable and gregarious couple who operated as a kind of artistic magnet, attracting a group of painters, writers and musicians around them, so that the village became, for a time, something of an artist's colony.

Here, Sargent began to make studies for the picture in the garden of the Millets' rented house, Farnham House, on the green in Broadway. His first model was their five-year-old daughter Kate, but she was replaced by Dorothy ('Dolly') and Marion ('Polly'), daughters of the illustrator Frederick Barnard, who were older and whose fair hair was better suited to the aesthetic of the painting. White dresses were made for them by Mrs Barnard and her sister in the smock-like style of Kate Greenaway's illustrations.

Sargent soon encountered a number of practical difficulties. Autumnal weather meant that the girls had to wear 'ulsters' beneath their flimsy white dresses and they found posing annoying. According to the designer Alice Comyns Carr, 'The little maidens were always loath to leave their play, and John used to fill his pockets with sweets to console his unwilling models for the loss of their cherished last game before bedtime.'

He began to paint towards the end of the flowering season, which meant that he had to 'scour the cottage gardens and transplant and make shift' to gather the floral elements of his picture. The American publisher Henry Harper noted that the English weather lived up to its reputation for unreliability when it came to reproducing the appropriate light conditions: 'Every evening during our visit, just before sunset, Sargent would produce his easel and a large canvas and set them up in the garden, and Fred Barnard's children would appear in costume ready to pose for him should the twilight meet Sargent's requirements. Many a time they were out and posing, but the light proved recalcitrant and there would be "nothing doing", much to the disgust of the children.'

Early in November Sargent returned to London, leaving the unfinished picture in store in Broadway. At about this time, the novelist Henry James, who had visited Farnham House, described the picture as a splendid idea, but he will have to wait to next summer to do anything successful with it. It is now only a powerful auguring'.

By the following year, the Millets had moved to Russell House, a few hundred yards down the road. Sargent was determined to be prepared for this second painting campaign, sending 50 Aurelian lily bulbs for Lucia Millet, Frank's sister, to plant in garden pots. He set himself the challenge of representing fugitive evening light, the artificial glow of the lanterns and the light reflected on the children's faces, the whites of their dresses and the lilies. Sargent wrote to his sister: 'Impossible colours of flowers and lamps, and brightest green lawn background. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.