Magazine article HRMagazine

Position Yourself: A Slipshod Position Statement in Response to an EEOC Claim Can Result in Years of Litigation

Magazine article HRMagazine

Position Yourself: A Slipshod Position Statement in Response to an EEOC Claim Can Result in Years of Litigation

Article excerpt

Before an employee can sue an organization for violating anti-discrimination laws, he or she must file a charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) or a similar state agency. The EEOC or state agency then notifies the employer of the charge and, in most cases, requests a formal, written response called a "position statement."

Many company leaders fail to realize just how important this statement is. Unless employers formulate a thorough, clear and consistent position, they may not be able to defend themselves successfully down the road.

Not only is a position statement an opportunity to explain why the complainant's allegations are false, it also serves as the first impression the employer will make with the EEOC- which can have lasting effects.

If the charge evolves into a lawsuit, the position statement and any supporting documentation can be admitted as evidence. Any inconsistencies between the reasons given over time for the employment decision at issue will damage the company's credibility.

Beware of Inconsistencies

It's essential to make sure any reasons given for an employment action are well-documented, agreed upon by all decision-makers and carefully articulated. Any deviation from that stated rationale can be very costly in subsequent litigation.

Inconsistencies don't have to be glaring to cause serious problems for an employer. For example, in Smith v. Shenandoah Valley Juvenile Det. Home Comm'n, conflicting details got the employer into trouble. In that case, managers at Shenandoah Valley, a juvenile detention home, fired an employee for allegedly falsifying a sick leave report. The employee, who is white, filed a charge with the EEOC alleging that her company retaliated against her because she had complained about discrimination in a letter written just two and a half months before she was terminated.

In its position statement, representatives for the organization stated that they first learned that the employee was submitting false leave requests on July 11,2002, when a shift supervisor saw her car parked outside the location of her part-time job within hours after she had taken sick leave at Shenandoah Valley. They further noted that the manager reported his sighting to the facility's assistant superintendent the next morning. The assistant superintendent subsequently shared the information with the superintendent, who then called the supervisor at the employee's part-time job and confirmed that she had worked the previous day. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.