Newspaper article The Journal (Newcastle, England)

Don't Whittle Away SFP by Farming

Newspaper article The Journal (Newcastle, England)

Don't Whittle Away SFP by Farming

Article excerpt

Byline: By Euryn Jones

While we still await details of some important aspects of the Fischler Reforms of the Common Agricultural Policy.

We particularly require details of the cross-compliance requirements ( there is now sufficient information available for farmers to start thinking seriously about the future direction of their business.

Given the busy lives farmers lead, it's not surprising that there are still plenty who have not really thought through the implications for their businesses.

One or two still find it difficult to believe that their Single Farm Payment will be received, regardless of whether they produce anything at all, provided they keep their land in good agricultural and environmental condition.

Currently, there are many livestock rearing and arable farmers whose total support cheques exceed their net profit.

Take a farm business with total revenue of pounds 70,000 and expenditure of pounds 80,000, but which also receives pounds 20,000 in support payments. A trading deficit of pounds 10,000 is turned into a profit of pounds 10,000 as a result of receiving the subsidy cheque.

Under current CAP arrangements incurring a trading deficit on the farm can be justified because no support payments can be claimed without producing crops or livestock.

From next year, however, all that will change, and while the new Single Farm Payment will inevitably be less than this year's subsidy cheques, due to modulation and other top-slicing cutbacks, it should still be more than the current pounds 10,000 net profit. …

Author Advanced search


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.