Newspaper article The Journal (Newcastle, England)

'Poshness Test' Unfair on Working-Class Students; SOCIETY

Newspaper article The Journal (Newcastle, England)

'Poshness Test' Unfair on Working-Class Students; SOCIETY

Article excerpt


YOUNG people from workingclass backgrounds are being systematically excluded from jobs in top legal and accountancy firms, an official report has found.

The chairman of the Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission, Alan Milburn, accused firms of imposing a "poshness test" that effectively excluded recruits whose parents do not have "the right sort of bank balances".

A study of 13 "elite" law, accountancy and financial services firms carried out for the commission found that 70% of job offers last year went to graduates who had been to feepaying or selective state schools. Former Labour cabinet minister Mr Milburn, who lives in Northumberland, said the findings should be a "wake up and smell the coffee moment" for employers who needed to ensure their recruitment practices were "genuinely meritocratic".

"This research shows that young people with working-class backgrounds are being systematically locked out of top jobs," he said.

"Elite firms seem to require applicants to pass a 'poshness test' to gain entry. Inevitably that ends up excluding youngsters who have the right sort of grades and abilities but whose parents do not have the right sort of bank balances.

"In some top law firms, trainees are more than five times likely to have attended a fee-paying school than the population as a whole.

"They are denying themselves talent, stymying young people's social mobility and fuelling the social divide that bedevils Britain."

The survey found that, at leading accountancy firms, typically 40% to 50% of applicants had been educated at the elite Russell Group universities and that they received 60% to 70% of all job offers.

It said that this was "a direct result of elite firms' recruitment and attraction strategies".

It urged firms to overhaul their recruitment policies to encourage candidates from a wider range of educational and socio-economic backgrounds, while ensuring they had similar levels of support to those enjoyed by their more privileged peers. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.