Newspaper article The Morning Bulletin (Rockhampton, Australia)

Reef Fund Raises More Questions

Newspaper article The Morning Bulletin (Rockhampton, Australia)

Reef Fund Raises More Questions

Article excerpt

Byline: Daniel Burdon APN Newsdesk

A PRIVATE foundation controlling millions of taxpayer dollars for research on the Great Barrier Reef has rejected concerns about its close links to the mining industry and banks funding resources projects.

The Great Barrier Reef Foundation's links have brought into question the process it used to allocate $4,410,000 in taxpayer-

funded research in the past two years on climate change effects on the reef.

Those funds are part of a $12.5 million four-year research program the Labor government funded in the 2012-13 Federal Budget.

The Abbott government has maintained that funding to 2015-16, most of which has not yet been transferred to the foundation.

GBRF managing director Claire Hanratty maintains the foundation has a rigorous governance process when it selects projects for funding, including board members declaring potential conflicts of interests.

She did not answer detailed questions about the process or how conflicts were managed.

While the links raise questions about how taxpayer funds are used for reef research, it is unclear what conflicts of interest the board has declared because meeting minutes and other documents are not publicly available.

In a statement, Ms Hanratty said all research proposals were independently peer-reviewed but the foundation also is not required to disclose these publicly.

Until a redesign this year, such reviews were not even mentioned on its website.

An international scientific advisory committee and a portfolio committee advise the board on which reef research projects should be funded. While a federal Environment Department representative sits on the portfolio committee, it is unclear whether that member can vote or is simply an observer, and questions put to the department about transparency and oversight remain unanswered nearly one week on.

But the foundation's board has the final say.

Until last month, eight of the 14 board members were linked to fossil fuel companies, banks financing mining projects or investment funds with interests in the resources industry. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.