Newspaper article The Journal (Newcastle, England)

Corbynistas Back Away from Legal Challenge

Newspaper article The Journal (Newcastle, England)

Corbynistas Back Away from Legal Challenge

Article excerpt

Byline: Arj Singh Reporter jnl.newsdesk@ncjmedia.co.uk

LABOUR'S leadership election will go ahead with the exclusion of around 130,000 new members after five of their number dropped their legal challenge against the decision to bar them.

The Court of Appeal on Friday overturned a previous judgment and therefore reinstated the decision of Labour's ruling body to exclude those who had not joined the party by January 12 and held membership continuously until July 12 - the "freeze date". Many of the members affected are believed to back leader Jeremy Corbyn and the five who brought the initial legal challenge to the High Court have said they will not seek to overturn the appeal court's decision in the Supreme Court.

The five - Christine Evangelou, Rev Edward Leir, Hannah Fordham, Chris Granger and "FM", a teenage member - have raised PS93,572 in donations but said they could not afford to take the case further.

In a message posted on their crowdfunding website, Ms Fordham said: "This has been an odd, emotional roller-coaster of a week for us all. "Thank you for supporting us through this, it's been a huge help to see how many of you care deeply about this unfair and unjust situation.

"Unfortunately, given the costs involved in pursuing the case further (the fee for getting the case even heard at the Supreme Court is around PS8,000), we have taken the decision that this is where this particular legal case has to stop.

"But the case wasn't in vain - although we didn't succeed in reclaiming votes for the 130,000 disenfranchised members, we did win in the High Court, exposing facts which have spurred important conversations about the role of the Labour Party membership and the NEC (National Executive Committee)."

Ms Fordham said the money raised would cover their legal fees and the PS30,000 in costs they were ordered to pay to the NEC, which brought the case.

It is understood that the Supreme Court was preparing to hear the case tomorrow and making urgent arrangements to pull back five justices during summer recess. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed

Oops!

An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.