Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Obama Puts New Limits on US Use of Nuclear Weapons

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Obama Puts New Limits on US Use of Nuclear Weapons

Article excerpt

The Pentagon's 'Nuclear Posture Review' narrows the list of potential targets, reflecting new threats like global terrorism. But Obama reserves the US right to strike first with nuclear weapons.

The Obama administration began its journey toward a world free of nuclear weapons by declaring that it would rely on such weapons less and conventional weapons more.

But in making what amounted to minor changes to its nuclear deterrence policy, it settled on the political middle ground, angering the left for what the administration didn't do, and the right for what it did.

The Pentagon Tuesday released the Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), a nearly 70-page, unclassified position paper that narrows the number of targets against which the US could use a nuclear weapon while maintaining the long-held right to launch first.

IN PICTURES: Nuclear power around the world

The NPR dictates that the US will not use a nuclear weapon against a non-nuclear state. This is a change from when the US maintained the right to use a nuclear weapon against any state attacking it with a weapon of mass destruction - including chemical or biological weapons - a restrictive move that helps put the US on the road to a nuclear weapon-free world.

But that pledge also includes a major caveat that gives the new policy plenty of wiggle room: the US still reserves the right to use a nuclear weapon against any country if it is not in compliance with "nonproliferation obligations" under international agreement, which means an attack against a country such as Iran.

"If a non-nuclear weapon state is in compliance with the nonproliferation treaty and its obligations, the US pledges not to use or threaten to use nuclear weapons against it," Defense Secretary Robert Gates said at the Pentagon Tuesday. "If any state eligible for this assurance were to use chemical or biological weapons against the United States or its allies or partners, it would face the prospect of a devastating conventional military response."

'First-use' policy remains

The new document maintains the status quo when it comes to "first- use," giving the Obama administration the right to attack first if it decides it is in the interest of national security, a move that heartens conservatives opposed to negotiated arms control.

President Obama, who was said to have been deeply involved in the effort, likely wanted to make deeper cuts to the nuclear weapon posture, but political pragmatism weighed against ideological determination.

"I think in his heart of hearts, he would have liked to go further, but you take what you can get," says Christopher Hellman with the National Priorities Project, in Northampton, Mass. "I think we could have done better, but I'm not surprised we didn't. We certainly could have done worse."

The document's release comes two days before Mr. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.