Republicans Fear 'War on the West' in New Wild Lands Protection

Article excerpt

Western Republican lawmakers and governors object to Obama administration plans to consider whether millions of acres of federal land in the West should be protected as 'wild lands.'

Western Republican lawmakers and governors are up in arms over the Obama administration's plan to consider whether millions of acres of federal land in the West should be protected as "wild lands."

Their outrage is setting the stage for a new round of the "sagebrush rebellion" over land use in the West - a battle that could have repercussions for Election 2012.

The Obama administration's plan would require federal agencies to manage such land primarily to preserve its wilderness characteristics - which could mean restrictions on commercial uses, including oil and gas development as well as motorized recreation. In essence, the new thrust reverses a 2003 Bush administration policy opening up federal land to more extractive uses.

In congressional testimony this week, Rep. Denny Rehberg of Montana called it a "war on the West."

Noting that royalties from mineral development help pay for public schools, Utah Gov. Gary Herbert, said, "This order hinders rural economic development and hurts key funding sources for Utah's school children."

Idaho Gov. Butch Otter urged Congress to "take back its authority" and block the new policy. (Under the Wilderness Act of 1964, only Congress can officially designate "wilderness" - areas "where the earth and community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain.")

The point of contention is Interior Secretary Ken Salazar's order in December that the Bureau of Land Management (which oversees some 245 million acres, most of it in the West) should regularly inventory its lands, factoring in wild characteristics when making land-use decisions.

The idea, according to the Interior Department, is to "restore balance and clarity to the management of public lands by establishing common-sense policy for the protection of backcountry areas where Americans recreate, find solitude, and enjoy the wild."

"Wild lands" would be designated after gathering public input, and unlike "wilderness" they could be given more (or less) protection without an act of Congress.

Old West vs. new West

The balance between environmental preservation and the use of natural resources - mining, logging, cattle grazing, oil and gas drilling, water - has been part of western history for a century or more, particularly since so much of the region is managed by federal agencies such as the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, and the National Park Service. …


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.