Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Is Obama Dragging His Feet on Environmental Issues to Get Reelected?

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Is Obama Dragging His Feet on Environmental Issues to Get Reelected?

Article excerpt

The Obama administration's recent record on environmental issues is uninspired, critics say. But the president faces more immediate problems with the economy and record-high unemployment.

To many environmentalists, the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) announcement this week that it would miss a deadline for setting greenhouse gas regulations for power plants and refineries is one more sign that the Obama administration is dragging its feet on a range of environmental issues.

Whether or not that's true, the economy - particularly record joblessness - seems to be trumping the environment these days.

Earlier this month, the White House asked the EPA to rewrite an air-quality rule on smog-producing ozone that critics warned would cost millions of jobs. The more pressing need now, President Obama said, is "reducing regulatory burdens and regulatory uncertainty, particularly as our economy continues to recover."

The administration also seems increasingly likely to approve the Keystone XL pipeline to transport tar sands oil from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico - a prospect that has seen protesters arrested outside the White House. Meanwhile, Obama signed a budget bill that could reduce protections for wolves and wilderness in western states.

Writing in the current issue of Rolling Stone magazine, Jeff Goodell, author of "How to Cool the Planet: Geoengineering and the Audacious Quest to Fix Earth's Climate," acknowledges that the president made a deal with automakers to double fuel-efficiency standards by 2025, increased spending for clean-energy research, and "made some impressive appointments to key positions," including EPA chief Lisa Jackson and Secretary of Energy Steven Chu.

"But overall, Obama's record on the environment has been uninspired - and that's putting it kindly," Mr. Goodell writes. "He hasn't stopped coal companies from blowing up mountaintops and devastating large regions of Appalachia. He caved in on tightening federal standards for ozone pollution, putting the lives of millions of Americans at risk. And the biggest tragedy: He has done almost nothing to rein in carbon pollution - or even to convince Americans that, in the long run, cooking the planet with coal and oil is a bad idea."

Presidents can't do everything at once, and the country again finds itself in a situation where "it's the economy, stupid" is again the prevailing mantra. Regulating corporate and individual action - particularly for a problem that seems to the lay person to be way off in the future - has become even more difficult.

Most of Obama's likely GOP opponents in the 2012 presidential election - even Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney, who once backed strong efforts to address greenhouse gas-induced climate change - are in the camp of global warming skeptics (if not deniers). …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.