Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Penn State, Sandusky, and Paterno: When Did Football Kill Student Activism?

Newspaper article The Christian Science Monitor

Penn State, Sandusky, and Paterno: When Did Football Kill Student Activism?

Article excerpt

It wasn't always like this. Throughout college football's history, students and players have boycotted games in protest of evils like segregation and racism. But what about alleged child sex abuse? Now, students seemed lulled into thinking that 'king football' must continue, at all costs.

In November 1961, newspapers reported that the Rose Bowl might invite the University of Alabama - the top-ranked college football team in the nation - to play the West Coast Conference champion, UCLA. Citing Alabama's segregationist policies on the field and off, UCLA students called for a boycott of the game if Alabama were selected.

The boycott was endorsed by the UCLA student newspaper, which ran a cartoon of the school mascot dressed as a Union soldier charging into battle in the Civil War. The mascot was carrying a banner, which bore a stark declaration: "We don't want Alabama!" Led by the star African-American fullback, Kermit Alexander, several members of the football team also pledged to sit out if Alabama were invited.

Alabama's president soon took his university out of the running, noting the "political risk" of playing in the Rose Bowl. And that was all because of the students at UCLA, who insisted that football take a back seat to the bigger issues at stake.

Compare that to recent events at Penn State, and you'll see how profoundly we've lost our way. Despite reports of child sexual abuse by a former coach - and the covering up of the same by university officials - students filled Penn State's stadium last Saturday to watch the Nittany Lions in their final home game. We can expect the same at Ohio State and Wisconsin, which will host the Lions' last two contests.

Fifty years ago, the evil of segregation was enough to get students to organize a football boycott. But today, the evil of child abuse - allegedly hidden, and thus perpetuated, by football coaches themselves - is not. Ditto for all the other well- documented scandals in the sport, including secret payments to students and the padding of their academic transcripts.

To be fair, Penn State students held a vigil for victims of child sexual abuse on the night before the matchup with Nebraska. They also wore dark blue to the game, in further recognition of the victims. And the players knelt in prayer after taking the field.

Yet the larger point is that they did take the field, and over 100,000 spectators cheered as they did. Some of them waved banners in praise of fired coach Joe Paterno, whom many students seem to regard as a victim in his own right; others held signs remembering the children who were abused. But both sides assumed that the game must go on.

That's been the typical student response to every bit of other bad news about college football. Yes, it's bloated and corrupt; but it's ours. And it must continue, at all costs.

That wasn't always the case. …

Search by... Author
Show... All Results Primary Sources Peer-reviewed


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.