The trend: Since 1952, stocks have risen in the last seven months
of every presidential election except two. The trouble: Both
exceptions occurred in the 2000s.
For investors wondering what 2012 will bring, Montana-based
InvesTech Research has a hot tip: Stay in stocks.
"The fact that we're approaching a Presidential Election likely
improves the chances that this will be a good year for the stock
market," writes James Stack, president of InvesTech Research, in a
recent portfolio strategy report. He especially likes the energy,
health-care, and technology sectors because they're poised for
growth and offer some attractive valuations.
It's a strategy based on precedent. Going back to 1836, the Dow
Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) has climbed an average 5.8 percent
in presidential election years. That's better than in the first two
years of presidential terms, when the Dow has returned an average 2
percent and 4.2 percent respectively.
The last seven months of an election year almost always juice
stockholders' portfolios. They've delivered positive returns for S&P
500 stockholders in all but two election years since 1952.
The correlation is no coincidence, according to analysts who
specialize in long-term cyclical patterns. Since politicians want to
get reelected, they do all they can to postpone tough measures and
instead keep public funds flowing into local economies, at least
until after the elections.
"They can grease people's wallets before they go into the voting
booth," says Jeffrey Hirsch, editor in chief of the Stock Trader's
Almanac and author of "Super Boom: Why the Dow Will Reach 38,820 and
How You Can Profit From It."
Even if investors see a rosy pattern shaping up, the question
nags: Is it likely to hold up this year? After all, 2008 was a
presidential election year, yet the S&P lost a heart-sinking 33.5
percent over the last seven months. Investors learned the election-
year rule of thumb has exceptions, and painfully sore ones at that.
Some students of market cycles are bracing for a bumpy 2012 and
more trouble in 2013. Although election-year dynamics can buoy
stocks, they can also be trumped by larger, "long wave" cyclical
forces, according to David Knox Barker, a market cycle analyst and
publisher of The Long Wave Dynamics Letter, which analyzes long-
Mr. Barker says these forces could once again supersede
politicians' best intentions, as happened in 2008. This time, he
says, watch out for ripple effects from a $1.3 trillion US deficit,
European debt woes, and deflationary pressures on fragile economies
around the world. …