No Way to Treat a Treaty

Article excerpt

With the defeat of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty in the United States Senate, the chickens came home to roost for President Clinton. He's paying the price for his treatment of the Republican Congress over the past five years and his weakened credibility.

That's not to say all the treaty's opponents, which included most GOP senators, were politically motivated. Even stalwart arms- controllers such as Sen. Richard Lugar (R) of Indiana judged the accord seriously flawed.

But the flaws, such as a weak verification system and few enforcement teeth, could have been addressed. The treaty should have been put on hold for consideration at a calmer moment. A small group of hard-core treaty rejectionists regrettably used Senate rules to shut off that option.

Their opposition, however, was predictable. The White House has had years to respond to such concerns, to meet with Republicans to try to overcome the objections, and to conduct a public campaign to build support for the treaty.

Instead it followed its standard operating procedure: Trot out the president for a photo-op treaty signing, then spend the next few years doing little except lobbing potshots at Senate GOP leaders, when convenient, for failing to bring the treaty up for a vote. …


An unknown error has occurred. Please click the button below to reload the page. If the problem persists, please try again in a little while.